Answer:
To reduce soft money contributions to political parties.
it has caused spending by interest groups to increase
Explanation:
giving money to political campaigns is considered free speech:
in "citizen united v fec" the supreme court said because corporations giving money to political campaigns is considered free speech and the government cant restrict it. giving money is protected under the first amendment
Soft money is unregulated donations to political parties for general "party-building" purposes, not the support of a particular candidate so it avoid various legal limitations
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act aka McCain-Feingold Act is a major amendment of the Federal Election Campaign Act 1971 passed by the US congress in 2002. Its goal was to reduce the increased use of soft money to fund advertising by political parties.
brainly.com/question/11364371
investopedia
wikipedia
C
Because immigrants were not safe and were not treated good at that time
Answer:
- He used public funds to build segregated schools for white and African American students.
Explanation:
Charles Aycock (1859-1912) was governor of North Carolina from 1901 to 1905. During his campaign, he promised he'd do his utmost to improve the public school system. When he was elected as governor, he dedicated himself to the betterment of education in the state. Using public funds, hundreds of schools were built across North Carolina, wages of teachers were increased, school terms were lengthened, and hundreds of public libraries were built. By the end of his term, 599 schools for whites and 91 for African Americans had been built. For his work in improving and expanding public education, he was known as the "Education Governor"
Um... do you have a link? to this question, because I don't see anything.
