The following that would most likely achieve your goal would be to <u>Send all the donations to the shelter that has the least.</u>
As the coordinator of a nonprofit that <em>distributes donated items</em> to three local homeless shelters, if i were to figure out a way to send donated items to three shelters that need them the most, <u>finding out the shelter that has the least</u> supplies and sending the donations to them would be the most plausible
The most likely answer would be the second option because the goal is to <em>distribute the donated items to the shelters who need it the most.</em>
<em />
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/15773457
Answer: Central route to persuasion
Explanation: In this case, the presenter used a central route to persuasion, so he cited information from the content itself, pointing to the benefits of a potentially profitable investment. The presenter did not hide the possibility of great risk, but this is why this is an example of a central persuasion route, since listing all the content directly, without any peripheral routes, and outlined the advantages and risks, managed to persuade potential customers to invest their money. Although all cards are on the table, both potential profit and risk, the information presented by the presenter is strong and convincing, the topic has interested the audience with its strength and relevant information, which can, as in this case, persuade the customers decisively even though there is a risk.
There is 8 different marshmallows. They are hearts, clovers, stars, horseshoes, blue moons, unicorns, rainbows and red Balloons.
Because of the exuberant freewheeling popular culture of the decade
Answer:
They attribute this to power struggles within the lab hierarchy.
Explanation:
In the scientific areas, research is usually carried out, and the scientists in charge of these studies that have the best reviews usually obtain better benefits than the researchers who are unnoticed. Therefore, it is essential to achieve good research results, although this often contributes to a power struggle between collaborators.
In laboratories, this struggle of power can be observed within the scientific hierarchy; this occurs among scientists with more experience, with those who have more time in the area, those who obtain better results, and those who want to achieve better benefits.
For example, in the case of anthropologists, Jona Salk observed that in some research he gave more importance to some results than others, he tried to show his power in the laboratory hierarchy and benefit some scientists.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
