The global economy of the 21st century can be summarized as: <span>an economic system that is more favorable for international business. Trade and imports are at an all time high, especially into the United States from places like China, Japan, and Hong Kong.</span>
Answer:Patricia is bound to perform
Explanation:Bound are words applied to the contract entered into, between a master and an apprentice the latter.
to impose legal obligations or duties upon a person or party to an agreement.
Answer:yes and yea and no
Your welcome
I already did that question your welcome
Answer: (D) Physical distraction
Explanation:
The physical distraction is one of the communication barrier that basically preventing us from interpreting the given data, ideas or any type of message. The physical distraction is using the various types of physical materials for the distracting the communication.
According to the given question, Hannah is posting her resume on the various types of organization websites but the formatting of the resume is very poor and there is also lots of spelling mistakes.
Therefore, the given scenario is the example of the psychical distraction communication barrier.
Answer:
The options are missing:
- File the return since you know that Mary has done them a favor by allowing them to move in.
-
Explain the residency requirement and file the return showing the grandson lived with Mary for more than half the year.
-
File the return, but only after Mary assures you that Sheila will not be claiming her son.
-
Explain to Mary that she is not eligible to claim her grandson, and that you cannot knowingly file an incorrect tax return.
My answer would be:
4. Explain to Mary that she is not eligible to claim her grandson, and that you cannot knowingly file an incorrect tax return.
Explanation:
This is both a legal and ethical question.
Legally, Mary is not allowed to deduct Heila's son as her dependent because she only lived with her for 5 months and the minimum requirement is 6 months.
Ethically, you are asked to benefit someone that is your friend (or might not), but in order to do so you must break the law. Is it ethical to break the law in order to benefit an specific person? The answer is no, the law should be the same for everyone. To be honest, no one will probably even realize that you did something illegal, but bad actions always have consequences and we do not always realize them.
