The correct answer is the second choice - peer review process in scientific research exists in order to verify that the conclusions that are made are supported by the data. You cannot make a valid conclusion if you do not have enough evidence or data to prove it - this is why your peers have to go through your research to make sure everything is done according to the rules of scientific research.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
They would freeze and it would be hard to find food because they are not accustomed to the different climate. They would also be easy prey because of the environment change they are not equipped for.
B) The atria only recieve blood and the Ventricles have to pump the blood
The best answer in this case is C, "the researchers applied creativity to solve a problem in running an experiment".
Distributing the computing load across the global community by sharing processing power is a creative response to tackle the challenge in simulating protein folding for the experiment. This does not change or reduce the scientific merits of the experiment, so we can discount the first two answers (a & b). Answer d talks about well established scientific techniques, although the question wasn't really centered around the specific techniques, so it's not as relevant an answer as C.
Answer:
The answer is, D. Aphotic.
