Answer:
c. The infant industry argument
Explanation:
Infant industry argument is a mechanism for trade protectionism. It argues that a new industry does not have the economies of scale enjoyed by older competitors.
So they will need to be protected and funded till they develop and match up with economies of scale of other competitors.
Infant industries need to be supported as they are not able compete favourably with other companies from abroad.
Their protection will lead to a more vibrant economy where multiple players compete favourably.
Answer:
3000
1500
Explanation:
For each of the answers in this question I have added the formulas to solve them in the attachment below
1.
(45-39)*5*100
= 3000
2.
(45-39)-3 x5 x100
= $1500
Answer:
The correct answers are letters "A" and "B": Your project is unimportant; I am unprofessional.
Explanation:
In business writing, it is very important to be <em>concise, clear, </em>and <em>professional</em>. Mason is showing none of that by sending a report using an old template without dedicating some minutes to review the content before sending the message. Mason's <em>unprofessional </em>behavior is reflected in not even changing the title of the report which is one of the most visible areas of the file. Under those circumstances, <em>the client may just believe making his report is not important for Mason</em>.
Answer:
The statement is: True.
Explanation:
Capital Goods are <em>assets with more than one year of useful life</em> that are used to generate other goods and income. <em>Capital goods and assets</em> as terms apply to the same category of resources but the context defines which one is being used. In the context of economic analysis, <em>capital goods</em> are used to refer to the amount of capital goods purchased and used in the overall economy. <em>Capital assets</em> is a term that is used more commonly in accounting and finance.
Answer:
$8,300
Explanation:
Calculation for what Elroy's incremental profit or loss would be if he chooses option 2 over option 1
Using this formula
Incremental Profit of option 2 over option 1= Profit from option 1 - Profit from option 2
Let plug in the formula
Incremental Profit of option 2 over option 1= ($3,600*3)-(3*$1,100 - $800)
Incremental Profit of option 2 over option 1= $10,800 - $2,500
Incremental Profit of option 2 over option 1= $8,300
Therefore Elroy's incremental profit or loss would be if he chooses option 2 over option 1 would be $8,300
