1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vladimir2022 [97]
3 years ago
11

The price of printing digital photos is $1.40 for 7 prints. If Louie wants to have 48 digital photos printed, what will be the c

ost?
Mathematics
1 answer:
Triss [41]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

$9.60

Step-by-step explanation:

1.40=7

divide both by 7

0.2=1

multiply by 48

0.2 x 48=9.6

You might be interested in
Give three real-world examples of rectangular prisms. Then give two real-world examples of triangular prisms. Explain how you kn
denpristay [2]

Three real world examples of rectangular prisms include juice boxes, cereal boxes, and even cargo containers. Two real world examples of triangular prisms include camping tents and triangular roofs. I chose these objects to represent triangular and rectangular prisms because triangular prisms have two triangular faces and three rectangular faces and rectangular prisms have six rectangular faces.

Sample Response: Boxes, ice cubes, and brick are examples of rectangular prisms. Ramps and tents are examples of triangular prisms. A rectangular prism has six rectangular faces. A triangular prism has two triangular faces and three rectangular faces.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select all the solutions to <br> ( x - 2) to the power of 2 = -16
leonid [27]
The answer are both:
x=2+4i,2-4i
4 0
3 years ago
A county environmental agency suspects that the fish in a particular polluted lake have elevated mercury levels. To confirm that
suter [353]

Answer:

a. The 95% confidence interval for the difference between means is (0.071, 0.389).

b. There is enough evidence to support the claim that the fish in this particular polluted lake have signficantly elevated mercury levels.

c. They agree. Both conclude that the levels of mercury are significnatly higher compared to a unpolluted lake.

In the case of the confidence interval, we reach this conclusion because the lower bound is greater than 0. This indicates that, with more than 95% confidence, we can tell that the difference in mercury levels is positive.

In the case of the hypothesis test, we conclude that because the P-value indicates there is a little chance we get that samples if there is no significant difference between the mercury levels. This indicates that the values of mercury in the polluted lake are significantly higher than the unpolluted lake.

Step-by-step explanation:

The table with the data is:

Sample 1 Sample 2

0.580    0.382

0.711      0.276

0.571     0.570

0.666    0.366

0.598

The mean and standard deviation for sample 1 are:

M=\dfrac{1}{5}\sum_{i=1}^{5}(0.58+0.711+0.571+0.666+0.598)\\\\\\ M=\dfrac{3.126}{5}=0.63

s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{(n-1)}\sum_{i=1}^{5}(x_i-M)^2}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{4}\cdot [(0.58-(0.63))^2+...+(0.598-(0.63))^2]}\\\\\\            s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{4}\cdot [(0.002)+(0.007)+(0.003)+(0.002)+(0.001)]}\\\\\\            s=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.015}{4}}=\sqrt{0.0037}\\\\\\s=0.061

The mean and standard deviation for sample 2 are:

M=\dfrac{1}{4}\sum_{i=1}^{4}(0.382+0.276+0.57+0.366)\\\\\\ M=\dfrac{1.594}{4}=0.4

s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{(n-1)}\sum_{i=1}^{4}(x_i-M)^2}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{3}\cdot [(0.382-(0.4))^2+(0.276-(0.4))^2+(0.57-(0.4))^2+(0.366-(0.4))^2]}\\\\\\            s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{3}\cdot [(0)+(0.015)+(0.029)+(0.001)]}\\\\\\            s=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.046}{3}}=\sqrt{0.015}\\\\\\s=0.123

<u>Confidence interval</u>

We have to calculate a 95% confidence interval for the difference between means.

The sample 1, of size n1=5 has a mean of 0.63 and a standard deviation of 0.061.

The sample 2, of size n2=4 has a mean of 0.4 and a standard deviation of 0.123.

The difference between sample means is Md=0.23.

M_d=M_1-M_2=0.63-0.4=0.23

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

s_{M_d}=\sqrt{\dfrac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1}+\dfrac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.061^2}{5}+\dfrac{0.123^2}{4}}\\\\\\s_{M_d}=\sqrt{0.001+0.004}=\sqrt{0.005}=0.07

The critical t-value for a 95% confidence interval is t=2.365.

The margin of error (MOE) can be calculated as:

MOE=t\cdot s_{M_d}=2.365 \cdot 0.07=0.159

Then, the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval are:

LL=M_d-t \cdot s_{M_d} = 0.23-0.159=0.071\\\\UL=M_d+t \cdot s_{M_d} = 0.23+0.159=0.389

The 95% confidence interval for the difference between means is (0.071, 0.389).

<u>Hypothesis test</u>

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between populations means.

The claim is that the fish in this particular polluted lake have signficantly elevated mercury levels.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

H_0: \mu_1-\mu_2=0\\\\H_a:\mu_1-\mu_2> 0

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1, of size n1=5 has a mean of 0.63 and a standard deviation of 0.061.

The sample 2, of size n2=4 has a mean of 0.4 and a standard deviation of 0.123.

The difference between sample means is Md=0.23.

M_d=M_1-M_2=0.63-0.4=0.23

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

s_{M_d}=\sqrt{\dfrac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1}+\dfrac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.061^2}{5}+\dfrac{0.123^2}{4}}\\\\\\s_{M_d}=\sqrt{0.001+0.004}=\sqrt{0.005}=0.07

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

t=\dfrac{M_d-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_{M_d}}=\dfrac{0.23-0}{0.07}=\dfrac{0.23}{0.07}=3.42

The degrees of freedom for this test are:

df=n_1+n_2-1=5+4-2=7

This test is a right-tailed test, with 7 degrees of freedom and t=3.42, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

\text{P-value}=P(t>3.42)=0.006

As the P-value (0.006) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the fish in this particular polluted lake have signficantly elevated mercury levels.

<u> </u>

c. They agree. Both conclude that the levels of mercury are significnatly higher compared to a unpolluted lake.

In the case of the confidence interval, we reach this conclusion because the lower bound is greater than 0. This indicates that, with more than 95% confidence, we can tell that the difference in mercury levels is positive.

In the case of the hypothesis test, we conclude that because the P-value indicates there is a little chance we get that samples if there is no significant difference between the mercury levels. This indicates that the values of mercury in the polluted lake are significantly higher than the unpolluted lake.

7 0
3 years ago
A hotel cost $89 per night. sally will receive a $5 per night discount for paying in advance.a rental car cost $35 per day plus
natulia [17]
You can multiply both 89 and 5 by both 5 because it's over a course of 5 days, than subtract the total by each other. For the rental you have to multiply ,35 by 5 and 4 than add those two sums together. Once you have all the totals, add them all together to get your answer
4 0
3 years ago
Please Help! I need the answer.
iren [92.7K]

Answer:

56

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Say you want to create a ladder .which lines should be parallel and perpendicular to each?
    8·2 answers
  • I need help asap please show work
    5·1 answer
  • I need help with my math homework
    15·2 answers
  • Sea World has 9 aquariums with small fish in them and the number of fish in each tank are shown below:45,10,48,19,36,25,63,14,37
    15·1 answer
  • I need help with #14. I checked on Desmos to see if they represent the same line, which they do. But how do you know if they rep
    8·1 answer
  • You take your car in for repairs. The service station charges $200 for parts plus $50 per hour for labor. What is the equation t
    9·1 answer
  • If the ratio of the measure of the complement of an angle to the measure of its supplement is 1:3, find the measure of the angle
    14·1 answer
  • Please help me :)), do not 'troll' with answers, it's graded...
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    13·2 answers
  • A certain substance in an experiment was being stored at −2.4°F. It was then placed on a table where the temperature was raised
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!