The piece of evidence which President Reagan use to logically conclude that the astronauts were aware of the dangers was the previous accident on the ground
- Former President Ronald Reagan gave a powerful speech concerning the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster which claimed the life of all crew members including a teacher.
- The shuttle’s launch was said to have been delayed at least two times before the lunch date and due to pressure from the White House, it launch on January 28, 1986.
- Due to this previous issues that happened on the ground not space, the shuttle malfunction and burst to flames and if this issues were handled before takeoff, this incident would not have happened.
The piece of evidence which President Reagan use to logically conclude that the astronauts were aware of the dangers was the previous accident on the ground
Learn more from
brainly.com/question/20609648
On a job application, you should list all the following under "skills" except athletic interests. The answer is D.
Answer:
P=380 ft.
Explanation:
Area=length x width
Perimeter= 2*length + 2*width
Width= 4*length + 8
A=5472 ft²
5472= l * (4l +8) (plug in values)
5472 = 4l² +8l (simplify)
4l² + 8l - 5472 = 0 (subtract 5472)
4(l² + 2l -1368) = 0 (factor out a 4)
4(l +38)(l-36)=0 (factor)
l=36 ft. (-38 is extraneous because it is negative)
5472=38*w
w=152 ft.
P=2(38) + 2(152)
P= 380 ft.
A word that best fits the definition of a general set of assumptions about the nature of both living and non-living things is: theoretical perspective.
A theoretical perspective can be defined as a terminology that is used to describe or qualify a general set of assumptions about the nature of both living and non-living things.
This ultimately implies that, a theoretical perspective comprises a general set of assumptions based on reality and as such it inform the questions that are asked and the kinds of answers that are obtained as a result.
In conclusion, a general set of assumptions about the nature of both living and non-living things is referred to as a theoretical perspective.
Read more on theoretical perspective here: brainly.com/question/9745856
The reason given by greene for why he believes parallel universes may exist is that there are only so many ways matter can arrange itself within that infinite universe.
<h3>Why parallel universe?</h3>
A matter is anything that has weight and occupy space. The whole universe consist of what is know as matter.
However, the theory of multiple universe shows that another universe may exist, which is quite distinct from what is already known to all.
Hence, this theory was supported by Brian Greene on the basis that there are only so many ways matter can arrange itself within that infinite universe.
Learn more about universe here : brainly.com/question/23147304
