Hmm, a strong argument typically includes a statement of one's own opinion, then your opponent's counterclaim, and reasons why the counterclaim is inaccurate or invalid. For instance, Tammy could have started off with a statement about how animal safety benefits the animals, and then address the counterclaim about it being expensive by stating it doesn't just help the animals, but the people as well. I think the answer here is false because Tammy's speech didn't include an argument about how expensive animal safety is. So false. I hope this helps, sorry it's so long.
Answer:
Eriki and two of his colleagues at Berlin's elite Academy of Music decide to make an experience using the musicians and their talents. The class of violinists and pianists were divided in 3 groups, using the skills levels as criteria. Every single student was asked about how many hours he /she had spent /training since the first time they touch the instrument
Ericsson discovered that the most successful players spent minimum 10,000 hours practicing.
Answer:
help the homeless people and all the sick people get better
The benefits of having more than one narrator include having more opinions and more than on side of a story.
