1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RoseWind [281]
3 years ago
5

In the 1800s, violent, anti-Chinese riots took place

History
2 answers:
irakobra [83]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A: in Chinatowns in several cities

Explanation:

For edge

LiRa [457]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

They’re right, the answer is A.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
3. What is the grand cause of fighting the American Revolution for the Americans
joja [24]

Answer:

THE TAXES

Explanation:IF THERE WHERE NOT ACTS or taxes it would be differnt!

4 0
3 years ago
Was meat handled and prepared in a safe and sanitary way for American consumers?<br> Yes or No?
sergij07 [2.7K]
What time period are you referring to because at one time no.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help<br> List 20 questions about mother jones
Yakvenalex [24]
What did mother jones do?
why is mother jones important?
What made mother jones do what she did?
How did mother jones feel after she did what she did?
Did she do her act negatively or positively?
4 0
2 years ago
How did Great Britain's political philosophy during the Industrial Revolution affect societies around the world?
GrogVix [38]
The answer would be B
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain how the U.S. supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona has impacted society?
andriy [413]
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)<span> required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be </span>informed<span> of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights. </span>

<span>The Exclusionary Rule prohibits evidence or testimony obtained illegally or in violation of the constitution from being used against the defendant in court. </span>

<span>The </span>Miranda<span> ruling has been revised somewhat by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. On June 1, 2010, the Roberts' Court released the opinion for </span>Berghuis v. Thompkins,<span> 08-1470 (2010), which held a defendant must </span>invoke<span> his right to remain silent (by stating he wants to remain silent), rather than </span>waive<span>it (by explicitly agreeing to answer questions before interrogation). </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • After being deployed and arriving on scene at an incident, the first task for response personnel is to: A. Check in and receive
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement is true regarding the American workforce of the 1930s? A. Children were driven out of the workforce. B. The perc
    10·1 answer
  • Which world leaders met at the tehran conference to discuss the invasion of german-occupied france?
    6·2 answers
  • Which are associated with the Hebrew people?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of a state?
    7·2 answers
  • What shared belief of both Justinian and Charlemagne helped build cultural unity in Europe?
    11·1 answer
  • Antonio tried to be cool, but even as the roar was in its first birth, he turned slowly to meet Felix’s eyes looking directly in
    5·1 answer
  • Establezca una línea de tiempo comprendida entre 1819 y 1829 con la llegada de Rosas al poder.
    14·1 answer
  • How did farmers help the Sumerian government?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the growth of Railways in Great Britain exceed the growth of railways in other countries?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!