1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
s2008m [1.1K]
3 years ago
9

At the end of World War II, businesses changed from making war materials to making

History
2 answers:
vaieri [72.5K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

D i think

Explanation:

kirill [66]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It either B or D

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What was the original name of the first successful English colony in North America?After that colony grew and became more prospe
jeka57 [31]

Well the first English settlement was really Roanoke, however it was not successful. The first successful one would be the new Virginia colony, later known as Jamestown;)

6 0
3 years ago
How would acquiring Hawaii as a territory benefit United States?
12345 [234]

Answer:

The us already has Hawaii as a territory

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why did so many countries get draged into world war 1?
ladessa [460]
Both countries were involved in a system if alliances.
5 0
3 years ago
Which law was passed in the Southern states to oppress blacks and force them into a status of second class citizens
Verdich [7]
The Southern states used Jim Crow Laws to discriminate African Americans
4 0
3 years ago
Why should historians avoid oversimplifications when analyzing sources?
Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory  evidence</em></u>

Explanation:

History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.

For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.

However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.

Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.

While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When and where was reflexology developed?
    7·1 answer
  • In “The Negro Speaks of Rivers,” how does Hughes use images of rivers, dark and light, to communicate the experience of his race
    5·1 answer
  • Why did Lincoln require ten percent for his plan of reconstruction?
    5·2 answers
  • Explain how Muhammad<br> spread his ideas of Islam to<br> the people living around him<br> in mecca.
    7·1 answer
  • A result of the colonists’ angry reaction to the Tea Act of 1773 was that the British Parliament banned the sale of tea. repeale
    15·2 answers
  • Please help me with history
    10·2 answers
  • Why do we celebrate labor day
    15·2 answers
  • In theory, under the U.S. Constitution, the federal government
    8·1 answer
  • 13. What advice would you give Janet as she tries to decide how to structure this loan to finance her trip to South
    14·1 answer
  • Rome food supply tell me anything about it
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!