Answer:
Westermarck was telling us that there are no absolute standards in morality and that moral truth is relative. The reason for his approach is that each person has a moral conscience that is unique. One cannot apply a standard theory of philosophical thought to each person, because each person’s morality is predicated upon the way he or she was brought up. Virtue Ethics deals with a person’s character, and the formation of that character has its beginnings at an early age by what that person was taught. Westermarck and Aristotle have similar thought processes involving an individual. Aristotle believed that moral virtue is product of habit learned from an early age. Westermarck thought that moral views were based upon subjective factors. Subjective habits are learned from parents, teachers, and life experiences unique to an individual. A consciousness of morality is derived from those teachings and experiences learned in youth. These moral thoughts were a product of reflection of what had been taught overtime, and which would become rational expressions of individual morality as an adult. Is it not true that the virtue of person is based upon what his or her moral conscience consists of? The psychological effects of these teachings and experiences gleamed in youth cannot be discarded as mere sophomoric intrusions of moral liabilities against the standards of morality, but must be considered an integral component for the search of moral truth. Westermarck’s theory is just as valid as any other moral theory.
Explanation:
Maybe include the name of the sports first, and then the specific stats.
Like - "NBA - Best Team Scores this Year." (or something like that)
Answer: Sci Fi: Ready Player One, Interstellar, Snowpiercer, Divergent, The Martian.
Science Fantasy: A Wrinkle in Time, Tomorrowland, Lucy, like every avengers movie and marvel movie ever made, Dr Strange.
Red is describing the hair
Persuasion<span> is an umbrella term of </span>influence<span>. Persuasion can attempt to influence a person's </span>beliefs<span>, </span>attitudes<span>, </span>intentions<span>, </span>motivations, orbehaviors.[1]<span> In business, persuasion is a process aimed at changing a person's (or a group's) attitude or behavior toward some event, idea, object, or other person(s), by using written or spoken words to convey information, feelings, or reasoning, or a combination thereof.</span>[2]<span>Persuasion is also an often used tool in the pursuit of personal gain, such as election campaigning, giving a </span>sales pitch,[3]<span> or in </span>trial advocacy. Persuasion can also be interpreted as using one's personal or positional resources to change people's behaviors or attitudes. Systematic persuasion is the process through which attitudes or beliefs are leveraged by appeals to logic and reason. Heuristic persuasion on the other hand is the process through which attitudes or beliefs are leveraged by appeals to habit or emotion.<span>[4]</span>