When the writers of the Constitution were initially deciding what powers and responsibilities the executive branch—headed by the president—would have, they were heavily influenced by their experience with the British government under King George III. Having seen how the king and other European monarchs tended to abuse their powers, the designers of the Constitution wanted to place strict limits on the power that the president would have. At the same time, they wanted to give the president enough power to conduct foreign policy and to run the federal government efficiently without being hampered by the squabbling of legislators from individual states. In other words, the Framers wanted to design an executive office that would provide effective and coherent leadership but that could never become a tyranny.
Read more: Executive Branch - The Executive Branch And The Constitution - President, Power, Powers, and Framers - JRank Articles https://law.jrank.org/pages/6652/Executive-Branch-Executive-Branch-Constitution.html#ixzz6rIgGN7y3
Answer:
The above statement is false
Explanation:
The antidiscrimination law of the state are written and it contains the fact that employers that are not subject under federal status and always increase their commitment as well as their legal answerability.
Answer:
Parole officer: speaks to judges
probation officer: makes a plan
probation officer: monitors
Parole officer: acts carefully
Explanation:
I hope it is correct!
C trust me ;) !!!! 196383