Information:
An ideal Supreme Court may come accross as scary but, if we think about it it's like any other building. Ususally, it has many pillars suppoting it and is usually decorated in coulourless way.
Extra Information:
Here are some pictures for you to look at if you are stilll finding it difficult to imagine what a supreme court may look like
Answer:
1. 2) Fishermen report low catch of species for eating.
Fishermen will first report that they were unable to catch much fish.
2. 3) Public hearings are held to determine all the possible solutions.
There will then be a public hearing where the possible reasons and solutions to the fish problem are discussed.
3. 4)Marine scientists count fish population.
As part of the solution, marine scientists will count the populations of fish in the water.
4. 5)The Department of Fish and Game evaluates the repopulation of fisheries.
Based on this count, the Department of Fish and Game will research to find out how they can repopulate the water bodies.
5. Department of Fish and Game sets limits for fishermen.
As a result of this research, the Department will come up with a limit on the amount of fish that can be caught in a particular period to enable to fish population to rise to a certain level again.
King John demanded soldiers or money from his barons in order to carry on a war in France over disputed lands. Many of the barons believed that the dispute between John and the French king was none of their business. So, they refused to send King John knights or pay what amounted to a special tax.
BRAINLIEST PLEASE
Answer: Abused and scorned though we may be, our List examples of God-given and constitutional rights African Americans were waiting for? (Brain / Notes) -The right to be equal -The right to vote -The right to be free to make choices about how to conduct their own lives as long as they do not interfere with the liberty of god given rights
Explanation:
Answer:
In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.
Hope this helps
