Answer:
Sparta was not quite the same as Athens in pretty much every manner, starting with its government. While Athens was a majority rule system, Sparta was a theocracy. In a government, the decision power is in the possession of a couple of individuals. Sparta's administration-just as Spartan culture-was committed to military strength. One of the primary ways they were comparative was in their type of government. Both Athens and Sparta had to get together, whose individuals were chosen by the people. Sparta was managed by two lords, who controlled until they passed on or were constrained out of office. Athens was controlled by archons, who were chosen yearly.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
Valence of electrons balance out the other electrons.
Explanation:
The answer is D. They are the main pillars of the religion. They tell you how to do what Muslim's do and when to do it and all that jazz :D
Latin America hold any real relevance to processes of political change in their own countries. ... Economic progress in Chile stands in contrast to Caribbean countries ... tic forces to have input in cases dominated by international forces, and vice .... what Joseph Nye terms “hard power,” this was an issue of international law,.
