The "subversiveness" of the characters can be presented with real-life examples that show how children behave and think. These characters were portrayed too unreal and innocent before the publication of "Where the Wild Things Are."
The question above does not show the article to which it refers, but it is possible to see that it refers to the works of writer Maurice Sendak. Accordingly, we can answer the questions with the following information:
- Maurice Sendak wrote children's books that revolutionized the children's literature market.
- Their books featured characters with realistic behaviors that can be found in any real-life children.
- That's because Maurice Sendak wrote characters that children could identify with, not characters that showed what adults expected of children.
Although praised by critics, Maurice Sendak had his work considered controversial, because it showed subversive and rebellious characters, in some ways. That's because, before he released his most famous work, "Where the Wild Things Are," the characters in children's books were quite innocent, obedient, without much personality.
More information:
brainly.com/question/404382?referrer=searchResults
C read the essay aloud to yourself
Answer:
C- Historical fiction gives readers a look back in time. It is important to note patterns and trends that affect society today.
Explanation:
I took the test on edge2021
The statement that is true about William Carlos Williams' poem "The Red Wheelbarrow" is: It is focused more on imagery than symbolism.
<h3>What is imagery?</h3>
Imagery is known as a literary device that is used to evoke a mental image or exercise the senses with images of what is being stated. "The Red Wheelbarrow" is one example that uses imagery.
The poem is known to be called an "imagist poetry". It uses its language to convey a vivid picture to the reader.
Learn more about imagery on brainly.com/question/640841
Answer:
They could be friends. Depending on the person / people, they could become really good friends. Of course, if the poor person gets jealous easily or if the rich person is too snobby, it may not work. Despite their differences, they are still people. They, of course, will have very different backgrounds. For example, I was once friends with a "rich" person before. I, myself, have come from a very low place but the person was very kind to me, despite my background. We would have playdates, sleepovers, etc. Although I felt as if they pitied me, they never showed it. I don't know if it was because they didn't want to be mean, or if they just generally saw me as a normal person, such as their self and I think that can show how people of different social classes can be very good friends.
