I believe that the appositive phrase would be "the one with the white blaze" as this renames "that horse" . I hop this helped, and please rate brainliest!
Have a nice day!
1. The names of the more vital characters. Rainsford, Whitney, General Zaroff, Ivan. Just to name a few, if not all.
2. Rainsford and Whitney are hunters. They admit to being hunters and looking for good hunt where they intend to be heading right from the beginning. They also mention moose and jaguar hunting.
3. Rainsford does not believe animals have the same type of feelings as people do. He believes the world is made up into two classes: the hunters and huntees. This is something he mentions to Whitney. He also believes that humans are the hunters.
4. Rainsford and Whitney are traveling by boat. Rainsford falls overboard and has the capacity and strength to swim all the way to shore. He is not where he intended to land while originally traveling on the ship.
5. Rainsford does not think people should hunt people.
6. Ivan is a Cossack.
7. Sanger Rainsford has written a book before about hunting. General Zaroff has admitted to reading it. This is not something you have to assume.
8. During the hunt, General Zaroff has every intention of killing Rainsford if he catches him. Zaroff does not win the game.
Ecclesiastical and pagan are opposites, so the answer is:
vegetarian: carnivore, because these are opposites, too.
The setting in Melville’s “<em>Bartleby the Scrivener</em>” is a crucial element in the story. The extended title, “<em>A Story of Wall-Street</em>”, provides the specific setting as regards place. At that time, Wall Street had become an important financial center in America. As regards the year of publication, the work was first published in 1953 which was a time of rapid development in American economy.
The story takes place in a law office in Manhattan. The office presents an <u>unfriendly environment</u> that resembles the <u>business-based atmosphere of Wall Street</u>. The space is described as “<em>entirely unhallowed by humanizing domestic associations</em>” (p.36). In that way, the author describes the <u>impersonality of a business society</u>. In this context, the author does not provide the reader with any information about the characters apart from their particular behavior in the office. Also, the word “walls” is repeated many times throughout the story and they refer to the barriers between employer and employee.
The aggregate of features and traits that form the individual nature ofsome person or <span>thing.</span>