In a little town not to far from here there was a farmer and his son. They lived on a little hill while they attended their farm off to the east. In the free time though when the little boy wasn’t helping his dad, he was working on a little dam.
<h2><u><em>delete my answer</em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em>do it</em></u></h2>
Are there any answer choices? Because its easier with them! I will help as much as possible if u tell me them!
Koko Marius and Xiao Long Company are not correct, as the exclusivity contract that Koko Marius signed was not yet over.
You did not show the text to which this question refers, but through questions similar to yours, we can see that this question refers to the text presented in the figure below.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Koko Marius signed the exclusive contract with the JiMing Company of his own free will.
- This contract required the exclusivity of one year of work, which is a rational and legal period.
- In this case, Koko Marius cannot justify breaking the contract because he was seeking professional growth, as he could legally do so after a short period.
In this case, we can affirm that Koko Marius and Xiao Long Company are incorrect regarding the breach of contract, since, under the law, this breach of contract was illegal.
More information:
brainly.com/question/12790234?referrer=searchResults