1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
castortr0y [4]
3 years ago
7

What did the original director of the federal bureau of investigation claim was the biggest threat faced by the american crimina

l justice system?
History
1 answer:
valentinak56 [21]3 years ago
7 0
He once said that "the Black Panther party , without question, represents the greatest threat to the internal security of the country."
You might be interested in
5. What killed many of the workers (6,000 in 5 years)?
skelet666 [1.2K]
A lot of stuff happened with the workers each year death occurred.
5 0
3 years ago
Why should you tell your parents you have social media
eimsori [14]

Answer:

You don't have to.......they know already..........they know everything you have and do without telling them! :P

jk.......cuz you have to!

Explanation:

Have a great day/night! ^_^

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the effects that the drought had on the civilizations of the Bronze Age
kicyunya [14]

Answer:

it caused multiple nations, cultures, and civilizations to collapse.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What did the British do concerning the following that agitated the colonies
olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer: The attempts by Britain to tax its North American colonists in the late 1700s led to arguments, war, the expulsion of British rule and the creation of a new nation.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. How does the author characterize the
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:s the United States enters the 21st century, it stands unchallenged as the world’s economic leader, a remarkable turnaround from the 1980s when many Americans had doubts about U.S. “competitiveness.” Productivity growth—the engine of improvement in average living standards—has rebounded from a 25-year slump of a little more than 1 percent a year to roughly 2.5 percent since 1995, a gain few had predicted.

Economic engagement with the rest of the world has played a key part in the U.S. economic revival. Our relatively open borders, which permit most foreign goods to come in with a zero or low tariff, have helped keep inflation in check, allowing the Federal Reserve to let the good times roll without hiking up interest rates as quickly as it might otherwise have done. Indeed, the influx of funds from abroad during the Asian financial crisis kept interest rates low and thereby encouraged a continued boom in investment and consumption, which more than offset any decline in American exports to Asia. Even so, during the 1990s, exports accounted for almost a quarter of the growth of output (though just 12 percent of U.S. gross domestic product at the end of the decade).

Yet as the new century dawns, America’s increasing economic interdependence with the rest of the world, known loosely as “globalization,” has come under attack. Much of the criticism is aimed at two international institutions that the United States helped create and lead: the International Monetary Fund, launched after World War II to provide emergency loans to countries with temporary balance-of-payments problems, and the World Trade Organization, created in 1995 during the last round of world trade negotiations, primarily to help settle trade disputes among countries.

The attacks on both institutions are varied and often inconsistent. But they clearly have taken their toll. For all practical purposes, the IMF is not likely to have its resources augmented any time soon by Congress (and thus by other national governments). Meanwhile, the failure of the WTO meetings in Seattle last December to produce even a roadmap for future trade negotiations—coupled with the protests that soiled the proceedings—has thrown a wrench into plans to reduce remaining barriers to world trade and investment.

For better or worse, it is now up to the United States, as it has been since World War II, to help shape the future of both organizations and arguably the course of the global economy. A broad consensus appears to exist here and elsewhere that governments should strive to improve the stability of the world economy and to advance living standards. But the consensus breaks down over how to do so. As the United States prepares to pick a new president and a new Congress, citizens and policymakers should be asking how best to promote stability and growth in the years ahead.

Unilateralism

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the Framers include a system of checks and balances in the Constitution?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements BEST represents Anne Frank's reaction to living in hiding?
    9·1 answer
  • Which two types of characters are usually least important to the story? antagonist and protagonist antagonist and flat character
    6·2 answers
  • How did imperialism, nationalism, and militarism contribute to making this a world war?
    7·1 answer
  • At the end of the 20th century, U.S. economy went into a boom cycle, but the budget still remained unbalanced.
    9·2 answers
  • In which mountains did the Incas build their expire
    5·2 answers
  • What best describes the type of government the United States has?
    5·2 answers
  • In addressing environmental issues, Christians must ______. look to other people to lead the way demonstrate healthy stewardship
    11·1 answer
  • Why does Winston Churchill consider this decision a disaster
    14·1 answer
  • Is a plain the result of constructive forces, destructive forces, or both? Explain.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!