1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dovator [93]
2 years ago
10

Reducing taxes increases the amount of money in the economy because __________. A. the government has more money available to sp

end B. banks have more money available to make loans C. consumers have more of their income available for spending D. government spending goes up to make up for less tax money coming in Please select the best answer from the choices provided A
Social Studies
2 answers:
VashaNatasha [74]2 years ago
4 0
C) consumers have more of their income available for spending.

*Explanation*
• if people are paying less taxes, they have more disposable income to spend in the businesses and government will earn taxes from VAT.
hope this helps x
geniusboy [140]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C. consumers have more of their income available for spending

Explanation:

Taxes take away from our income and give it to government. If taxes reduce then we have more money to spend

You might be interested in
Major Canadian Cities and Their Approximate Population Toronto: 4,600,000 Montreal: 3,300,000 Vancouver: 1,800,000 Ottawa: 800,0
TiliK225 [7]

Answer:

C) They are all located close to the U.S. Border

Explanation:

All four of these cities are located very close to the U.S. border.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Immanuel Kant's moral philosophy is extremely strict about what we ought and ought not do. So strict that he argued that it is a
mrs_skeptik [129]

Answer:

Throughout the clarification article following, the interpretation of the query becomes discussed.

Explanation:

  • Kant was indeed an actual owner in almost every field of philosophy, not only within the field of business ethics. Throughout the last 2 decades of its existence, his popularity skyrocketed as well as his works became much more successful throughout Europe mostly during the 19th century than almost any other intellectual. His ideas were adopted by many thinkers as well as a specialized Kantian terminology was promulgated. That being said, some were less impressed with the complex metaphysical structure of Kant as well as managed to pick up pieces of it, including all the moral law.
  • A secondary unresolved issue with either the categorical imperative surrounds the assumption of Kant that perhaps the separate solutions were just distinct ways of voicing a certain fundamental belief. For Kant, the aspect that encompasses all four of them might be whether our fair understanding of obligation should direct us.
  • The very first formula illustrates the fact that neither inconsistencies are involved in logical choices, is nonetheless present in the case of the deceitful pledge. The second includes respecting all reasonable human creatures' integrity and moral worth as we behave. The third includes determining if our expected maxims are deserving of our role as the world's logical shapers. The fourth includes determining if our propositions work in the objective moral culture as fundamental laws efficiently and effectively.
  • But the inspiration of Kant to bind his different formulas around might again be attributed to the effects of certain predecessors. Theorists in human morality from either the period throughout Aquinas concluded that perhaps the highest average standard of morality is determined by laws of nature, and every one of our responsibilities is united in that standard. For Baumgarten as well as Wolff, too. For Kant, their supreme philosophy is loosely reduced to something like the mere assertion that "we should be doing better and stop bad."
  • It would have no intellectual value, Kant claims, which merely assumes that we are religiously bound to be moral. To substitute the null concept suggested through Wolff as well as Baumgarten, Kant, therefore, established his moral argument. All we tell about everyone's moral duties must be based on a single idea, according to Kant's way of looking at things. He then worked to explain how in a single framework the varying elements of our moral thought bind through.
  • That very many analyses of the ontological argument have concentrated since Kant's original time on either the Formula including its Rule of Nature as well as the struggle for a presumed paradox. This is particularly appealing to philosophers which love underlying ideal philosophy because it poses an enticing intellectual challenge. Although in his Formula including its End own sake, that also can be both a natural and successful method of creating moral decisions, the significant accomplishment to Kant's categorical affirmative increasing rest.
  • Lying becomes, almost all of the moment, a terrible thing about doing. Nor were there any situations during which the best thing to do is to lie? It made me uncomfortable when I momentarily learned Kant at college, although Kant says cheating has always been inappropriate therefore socially unacceptable.
  • Lying is occasionally good. But the slope is slippery. I recall hearing a colleague lying to some other friend sometimes of how much blackjack resources he and I've already spent to make the joke even more amusing.
6 0
3 years ago
Put the events in order of accurance from first to last:
Ivenika [448]
The answer is d day invasion v e day v j day attack on Pearl Harbor
6 0
2 years ago
What challenges did nigeria faced after it gained its independence from Britain
rjkz [21]

One of Nigeria's biggest problems is its lack of good leadership. Nigeria has barely managed to rule itself efficiently or achieve political stability since it gained independence 56 years ago. the Nigerian civil service has depreciated over the years and now riddled with corruption and ineptitude. Being so with Corruption, Impunity Leaders, Internal Strife, Worsening Economy, Administrative Inefficiency and Over Dependence on Oil.

3 0
3 years ago
What's the main purpose of the U.S. Constitution?
lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

There are three main purposes:

Explanation:

The Constitution has three main functions.  First it creates a national government consisting of a legislative, an executive, and a judicial branch, with a system of checks and balances among the three branches.  Second, it divides power between the federal government and the states.  And third, it protects various individual liberties of American citizens

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which region is largest in Texas? *
    15·1 answer
  • Marxists regard ________ as a product of the moral degeneration and estrangement fostered by the oppression and exploitation of
    6·1 answer
  • Felix was so preoccupied with his girlfriend's good looks that he failed to perceive any of her less admirable characteristics.
    6·1 answer
  • An important feature of informational social influence is that it often leads to
    11·1 answer
  • Why is economic relationship is important
    11·1 answer
  • Alex is describing to a friend who has just been given time in a juvenile detention facility what it will be like. Which of the
    15·2 answers
  • Why do you think the Chinese called the first part of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty the Spring and Autumn Period?
    7·2 answers
  • can you formulate a theory that explains what could have happend ti the second groupof setters on Roanoke Island?
    13·1 answer
  • Attempt, conspiracy, and solicitation are what type of crime?
    13·2 answers
  • You break it you buy it is often referred to as the what?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!