Answer:
c. lower the risk of supply disruption
Explanation:
Having multiple suppliers is always a good sourcing strategy, as it <u>minimizes the risk of supply disruption</u>. If one of the suppliers fails to maintain the contract due to various reasons (bad business operating), the risk is dispersed among a few suppliers, so there is the contingency principle applied.
This way, the supply chain never gets disrupted.
These transactions would be recorded in the <span>non-cash investing and financing activities. Since this that does not directly affect the cash on hand, instead, the</span> issuance of common stock to retire long-term debt is done.
Answer:
The most probable result is that the court will declare the contract invalid and non-binding because the purchase price and important terms regarding the consideration involve are too vague and indefinite.
In order for a contract to be considered valid and binding, consideration must exist and the more precise the terms, the better. Consideration is something of value that both parties exchange. In this case it is a house vs. money, but the price is not specified.
Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
When the price at which the quantity of a product willing to be purchased by customers and the quantity of product willing to be made by a producer are equal, this is known as the equilibrium price. Equilibrium price is the price set by a market in which the amount of products that are supplied is equal to the amount of products that are demanded.
