1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vekshin1
3 years ago
7

We should not interfere in the affairs of other countries​

History
1 answer:
topjm [15]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Depends on the situation.

Explanation:

As humans, we should be concerned about the affairs of other humans regardless of which country they are in. It is with this in mind that proponents of foreign intervention in the affairs of other countries argue their logic.

Sometimes countries find governments in power that are detrimental to the wellbeing of people in the country. These governments could be killing their citizens or denying them rights and in cases like this, it is not hard to see why some propose intervention. Take the Rwandan genocide for instance, more than 800,000 thousand people were killed while the world stood and watched because they did not want to interfere. Look at Ethiopia today - thousands are dying in Tigray but because Ethiopia is asserting it's sovereignty, other countries are not intervening.

Of course there are times where intervention is not such a great solution such as when the intervening country is doing it out of selfish reasons like the British and the French during the Suez crisis. Regardless of this however, it is important that interventions are sometimes done so as to protect the humans in other countries when their government fails to do so because at the end of the day we are all humans, regardless of nationality.

You might be interested in
What happened to the continent of Africa as a result of the berlin conference
dedylja [7]
The main was the Berlin Conference affected Africa was by chopping it all up into areas that would be colonized by several European countries. Before the Conference, Africans did have most of Africa still in their hands. During the conference, the European countries divided up essentially almost all of Africa. That means European countries would get to own parts of Africa. 

This added fate to the African continent.

This affected colonization in 2 BIG ways:
     -colonial governments and economies were made/set up to help the Europeans, NOT the Africans. They did not really educate Africans, either.

     -Another way was the European governments easily divided Africa up however they wanted and needed. (not even taking the human geography of Africa under consideration) They separated people of 1 ethnic group into different countries. Once these countries became independent, they obviously ended up having ethnic conflicts, which further weakened them.

Overall, the main affect of the Berlin Conference was to colonize Africa, which lead to MANY of the problems that the continent still endures to this day.

Hope I helped :)


7 0
3 years ago
Why were west african kingdoms like ghana and mali successful during the post-classical period?
IrinaVladis [17]
They adopted Islam and established trade relations with Muslims
4 0
3 years ago
What rights did the creek nation seek to confirm in its 1832 memorial to congress?
ehidna [41]

Rights the creek nation seek to confirm in its 1832 memorial to congress are:

⇒Not be slaves

⇒Own their land

⇒Have a separate political, cultural identity

⇒Wanted t reaffirm rights in national treaties

Native Americans who spoke Creek and Muskogean and once inhabited a sizable portion of the flatlands of what are now Georgia and Alabama.

The Hitchiti and Alabama, known as the Lower Creeks, shared the same fundamental traditions as the Upper Creeks but spoke a somewhat different dialect.

The Muskogee, also known as the Upper Creeks, were the original inhabitants of the northern Creek area.

To learn more about Creeks here

brainly.com/question/10629825

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
1 Point
Molodets [167]
The answer is a. Hope this helps.
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following refers to the idea that every person must obey the law, even
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Answer:

Another important idea is the “rule of law.” The rule of law means that everyone must obey the law and no one is above the law.Explanation: hope this helps pls mark brainleast

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why are funds in checking accounts called demand products
    14·1 answer
  • what was the long term impact of martin luther's break from the catholic church? what do we see today as a result of his revolut
    12·1 answer
  • NEED THIS ASAP 30 POINTS TO WHO GETS IT RIGHT
    12·2 answers
  • Will mark brainliest please help me with these thank you
    13·2 answers
  • How might a surplus of food have helped civilizations advance from hunter-gatherer societies?
    10·2 answers
  • Impeachment of the President by Congress is an example of:
    13·1 answer
  • 3.
    9·1 answer
  • Though child-labor laws existed, they had little impact because
    6·1 answer
  • Question 12
    8·1 answer
  • How does the Securities and Exchange Commission help promote transparency and responsibility in the
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!