Answer:
No, death of Mercutio does not seem to be justified.
Death of Mercutio can not be justified because his death was accidental.
Neither Tybalt's death seem to be justified.
Explanation:
Romeo and Juliet is a Romantic Tragedy written by William Shakespeare.
In Act 3, Scene 1, of the play, in a feud between Tybalt and Mercutio, Mercutio was killed accidentally by Tybalt. Tybalt and Mercutio entered the sword fight after Tybalt continues to instigate Romeo for fight and Mercutio, being hot-tempered, challenged Tybalt for the feud. To stop the fight, Romeo enters the feud and in this, Tybalt's sword escapes Romeo's arm and stabs Mercutio to death.
So, this shows that Mercutio does not seem to die and his death can not be justified as his death was an accident.
Death of Tybalt also does not seem to be justified as he was killed in anger by Romeo to avenge the death of his friend, Mercutio. After killing Tybalt, Romeo also seem to realize that he should not have killed Tybalt.
It's simile. It compares the dog to a bulldozer to make it more dramatic.
Srry cant help u i dont see it really well
For 1 Part A, the answer is:
<span>persuade readers that babies are born without a tendency to show prejudice.
For Part B:
</span><span>We can put our faith in young people as a positive force.
For 2:
</span><span>The government should encourage teachers to promote tolerance.
For 3:
She appeals to the readers by convincing us that what she desires is possible simply by stating it:
</span>It is possible for all of us to work on this—at home, in our schools, at our jobs.
It is possible to work on human relationships in every area of our lives.
