D. His isolation from humanity is the most likely reason that a reader of Frankenstein would find the creature somewhat sympathetic.
It is a rejected creature - everybody is afraid of him and hates him. This is the reason why a reader will sympathize with the lonely monster who didn't even ask to be created.
I think that pick up is the answer
Answer:
The main idea that the author Caitlin Kenney seems to address in this essay seems to be that even though money has no direct relationship with the level of happiness of a person, it has some influence, to a certain extent, of making the person believe that her life is much better than that of the ones poorer than her.
Explanation:
In the study of how incomes have any impact on the overall happiness of a person, Caitlin Kenney's "High Incomes Don't Bring You Happiness" delves into what it is that makes money an important factor of our lives and do they have any connection with how people feel about their lives.
Starting the essay with the question<em> "How much do you think it would take to make you happy?</em>" the author implores into the issue of how high-income groups seem to be relatively happier than the ones in the lower-income groups. Referencing to the study by psychologist Daniel Kahneman and economist Angus Deaton, the study further reveals how certain amounts of income seem to have a lighter effect on people. But overall, even though money has no direct connection with how happy a person is, there is still some effect it has, like influencing people to believe that the life they live is much better than the ones lived by the poorer people.
Answer:
message---------- the main point or idea
audience---------- who the document is for
tone-------- author's attitude towards the subject
individual---------- author's backround
purpose---------- what an author hopes to accomplish
situation---------- the time place & circumstances
I would have to say that the best way to revise sentence four is by changing "aren't" and "they're" to "are not" and "they are."
"Argue" works better than "fight."
Deleting the entire sentence would remove the transition into cost efficiency of the tablets.
And moving the sentence to the end would place the transition to cost efficiency in the wrong place.
