This is true. A thesis statement is you opinion. This means that not everyone will agree with your opinion. For example:
Smoking should be illegal because it is unhealthy, costly, and an annoyance.
Though you supported your opinion, someone who enjoys smoking may say that it is not costly or annoying. This is why a thesis statement is controversial.
The correct answer is B. Why don't we start with the symbolism of the door?
Explanation:
An outline is a plan or summary that contains the main or ideas to be developed during a speech or texts and that helps the author to cover all the ideas in an organized way. This means outlines mainly organize the content that should be included in some text, speech or discussion. In the case of outlining a discussion plan, it means to organized in a plan the contents that will be discussed and the order of them which allows the discussion to flow and cover all the important points. Considering this, the sentence that illustrates the technique of outlining a discussion plan is "Why don't we start with the symbolism of the door?" because this sentence shows Jeniffer has a plan to follow during the discussion and to cover all the important content, which is what the technique of outlining a discussion is about.
Answer:
im not sure if this is what you asked but hope it helps :)
Explanation:
Rights Reserved to Citizens
The Constitution reserves a few rights for citizens alone. Most notably, the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV, Section 2, and the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment both protect the “privileges” and “immunities” of US citizens against various types of interference by state governments.
The Second and Ninth Amendments indicate that the rights they protect are those of “the people.” While the Supreme Court has never addressed this issue, lower courts have disagreed over whether “the people” entitled to the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms includes noncitizens, especially undocumented immigrants.
That a few constitutional rights may be specifically reserved to citizens underscores the broader principle that the vast majority are not. There would be no need to specify such a reservation if the Constitution had a default rule limiting rights to citizens.
In reality, the vast majority of rights outlined in the Constitution are phrased as general limitations on government power, not special protections for a specific class of people — be they citizens or some other group.
Maybe you have to check yourself and see where the need of improvement is needed.
