Answer:
Sure no problem. I also ran it through Gramarly Premium word check and phrase.
Before:
In The Alchemist, the spiritual unity represented by the Soul of the World binds together all of nature, from human beings to desert sand. This idea underlies the parallel we see in the novel between the alchemist purifying metal into gold and Santiago purifying himself into someone capable of achieving his Personal Legend. According to the novel, the Soul of the World has created an ultimate desire, or Personal Legend, for everything, whether Santiago or a piece of iron. To accomplish its Personal Legend, each thing must learn to tap into the Soul of the World, which purifies it. That continual purification ultimately leads to perfection. This notion of humans, metals, and all other things sharing the same goal demonstrates that all elements in nature are essentially different forms of a single spirit."
After:
In The Alchemist, the profound solidarity addressed by the Soul of the World ties together the entirety of nature, from people to abandon sand. This thought underlies the equal we find in the novel between the chemist refining metal into gold and Santiago cleaning himself into somebody equipped for accomplishing his Personal Legend. As per the novel, the Soul of the World has made an extreme craving, or Personal Legend, for everything, regardless of whether Santiago or a piece of iron. To achieve its Personal Legend, every thing should figure out how to take advantage of the Soul of the World, which decontaminates it. That consistent refinement eventually prompts flawlessness. This thought of people, metals, and any remaining things having a similar objective exhibits that all components in nature are basically various types of a solitary soul."
Can I have brainliest?
Answer:
i seen things from their perspective and gave my reasoning for why i think what i think and we came to a agreement
Answer: Change the underline words to these! If there is an added punctuation, add that too!
1. Yourself
2. Comma (,)
3. Whom
4. Who
Explanation:
1. oneself doesn’t make sense, instead use “yourself”
2. The comma is used to create a pause which feels needed there
3. Who could become whom as this is appropriate here
4. Whom isn’t appropriate. Yet, Who is!
<span>b. believe in luck because he did not get hit</span>
Answer:
<em>And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republican government - the ballot.</em>
Explanation:
Susan B. Anthony's speech "On Women's Right To Vote" invokes the Preamble of the Consitution of the United States about the inclusion of women in its statement <em>"We, the people"</em>. She reiterates that the <em>"we"</em> in the Preamble means not only the men but also the women, and the equality of all genders.
In the given excerpt from her speech, she declares her intention to prove that <em>"voting" </em>is not a crime but a simple <em>"[exercising] of her citizen's rights"</em> guaranteed by the National Constitution. So, it is upon her now to show that she has committed no crime as such as simply doing right by the very rights that the nation has given to everyone.
Thus, the sentence that reveals the purpose of her speech is seen in the last line
<em>And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republican government - the ballot.</em>
