1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MArishka [77]
3 years ago
12

Can you reword this paragraph please?

English
1 answer:
Ira Lisetskai [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Sure no problem. I also ran it through Gramarly Premium word check and phrase.

Before:

In The Alchemist, the spiritual unity represented by the Soul of the World binds together all of nature, from human beings to desert sand. This idea underlies the parallel we see in the novel between the alchemist purifying metal into gold and Santiago purifying himself into someone capable of achieving his Personal Legend. According to the novel, the Soul of the World has created an ultimate desire, or Personal Legend, for everything, whether Santiago or a piece of iron. To accomplish its Personal Legend, each thing must learn to tap into the Soul of the World, which purifies it. That continual purification ultimately leads to perfection. This notion of humans, metals, and all other things sharing the same goal demonstrates that all elements in nature are essentially different forms of a single spirit."

After:

In The Alchemist, the profound solidarity addressed by the Soul of the World ties together the entirety of nature, from people to abandon sand. This thought underlies the equal we find in the novel between the chemist refining metal into gold and Santiago cleaning himself into somebody equipped for accomplishing his Personal Legend. As per the novel, the Soul of the World has made an extreme craving, or Personal Legend, for everything, regardless of whether Santiago or a piece of iron. To achieve its Personal Legend, every thing should figure out how to take advantage of the Soul of the World, which decontaminates it. That consistent refinement eventually prompts flawlessness. This thought of people, metals, and any remaining things having a similar objective exhibits that all components in nature are basically various types of a solitary soul."

Can I have brainliest?

You might be interested in
What are mr. bedford and mr. cavor traits, motivations, and personalities from the first men in the moon.
ohaa [14]

Answer:

the answer is an eccentric scientist

3 0
3 years ago
What you think about robots (400 words) I’ll give brainliest
tia_tia [17]

Answer:

Will robots change our lives in the future? It's a funny question to ask when they're changing our lives now in so many ways and they have been for years. From the first time you saw a toaster pop up by itself, we've casually accepted that machines can be trusted to do things for us.

They record our shows, cook our food, play our music, and even run our cars. We just don't see it because these "robots" don't have a face we can talk to or a butt we can kick.

Technically robots are automatic motorised tools, but they're generally known as clunky humanoid foils that have bumbled about popular media for almost a century - mechanised characters of humour, or menace without status, rendering their violent removal a minor plot without guilt.

Boom, there goes another one. The hero saves the day.

Sad actually. Mobile robots have gotten a bad rap from a lot of prejudicial movies and video games, and not the least from the unfulfilled promises of the 20th century. What's taking these scientists so long? If robots are coming, then why can't I just buy one to do my work while I watch TV?

Well, if you do watch TV, you'll "know" that's a recipe for disaster (which ain't true, but whatever...), which is why, after a lifetime building robots the old "serious" way, I decided to introduce something new to the mix: funny robots with personality flaws.

Since 2004 we've sold millions worldwide which has certainly changed some peoples lives and attitudes (mainly kids), and not one of which has ever threatened a single 007 agent. All part of my plan to get robots out of negative fiction and into entertaining reality, where yearly I foist my new devices on an unsuspecting populace.

But it's not world domination I'm after. I know four things robots can do right now that will change our lives for the future, and all in a good way. The first is entertainment (done that), the second is grunt work in dangerous places (coming up), third is elderly care, and last but not least is telepresence shopping, tourism, and assistance.

Imagine sitting at your computer and controlling a video game character through a mall or market, except it's not a game, it's a robot shopping for you in Tokyo while you sit comfortably in London. With a live video and audio feed so you could haggle, you drive a legged humanoid robot about your size so you get a good sense of what would fit, and afterwards you go for a walk to see what the countryside has to offer.

In a future where the cost and inconvenience of travel will likely rise, why not rent-a-rob for an hour just to make sure that resort is up to standard? Or to check in on your mum? Or to help out at a disaster site? Or just get outside in anonymity?

Right now all modern technology is designed to bring the world to you; phone, radio, television, internet, but if trends continue, robots will soon bring you to the world, everywhere, and at the speed of thought. A mind and a hand where it's needed while you sit safely at home and run the show.

It's a future goal -- something we know we can do if we can urge the market towards it, but it's one I like, and might even be able to do something about.

If it works, robots won't just change our lives in the future, they'll expand them. Not just for fun, but for necessity. We've taken the first steps into welcoming them into our homes, we just have to wait a bit to proctor them into making us more human.

Explanation:

hope this helps....

7 0
3 years ago
Read the sentences. The writer was an authoritative source on the topic. She held many degrees, was a guest on talk shows, and w
Gala2k [10]
The correct answer is A. reliable.
The writer was 'an authoritative source' because of her degrees, guest appearances, etc. Thus, she was a source you could rely on, she was reliable, given that she had experience to back her ideas up. Therefore A is the only correct answer.
4 0
3 years ago
Which qualities does the American Romanticism hero embody?
notsponge [240]
C) your welcome oooooooooooooooooo
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement about changes that occurred during the Industrial Revolution is true? A)Industrialization did not take place in
pishuonlain [190]
<span>B) Many people moved from farms and small towns to cities to find employment in textile factories</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In "Interview with President Lincoln," Charles Farrar Browne uses a different spelling for some common words to indicate the nar
    11·2 answers
  • One purpose of Horatio’s line is to further the development of which theme?
    15·2 answers
  • What is antithesis in seven ages of man
    11·1 answer
  • Which sentence uses punctuation and capitalization correctly? A. Andrews 12th birthday was on January 1 2008. B. Andrews 12th bi
    11·1 answer
  • What happened in Mr. Barnett’s store when Cassie was finally allowed to visit Strawberry? Explain the event from both Cassie’s a
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Which statement best describes the significance of the four rivers specifically mentioned in I the poem? a. All four rivers p
    15·2 answers
  • He could not help, ______thought of his beloved wife. *
    15·2 answers
  • In this, as well as in many other respects, there is one class of people (whose virtues of probity and humanity are well known)
    14·2 answers
  • Hlp<br> Foscarelli's testimony lines up with Masterman's testimony.<br><br> True<br> False
    13·2 answers
  • Why did Dougie Evan’s blame Kara’s mum for his son’s death
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!