Yes because there might be some things that the buyer might need to know or want to know
Answer:
<em>Building the house on the top of a hill, she became famous.</em>
Explanation:
The given sentences are two independent clauses that talk about a single noun/ pronoun (in this case). And to rewrite them, we need a change in the way the sentence is constructed, depending on what the requirement is.
With the need to start the sentence with "building", we can rewrite the given sentences as "building the house on the top of a hill, she became famous." This makes the first part a dependent clause, starting the sentence with a participial phrase and also a gerund "building", thus the need for a comma after "hill".
Thus, the new sentence will become
<em>Building the house on the top of a hill, she became famous.</em>
Answer and Explanation:
<u>Zaroff and Rainsford are characters in Richard Connell's short story "The Most Dangerous Game". The whole story revolves around what is moral and what is not, as well as the characters' ability to empathize with others.</u>
It is interesting to notice that Rainsford and Zaroff are more similar than they are different. They are both skilled hunters who also happen to be quite arrogant about their profession. Both fail to empathize with their prey. However, this is where the difference begins and ends.<u> Rainsford hunts wild animals. </u>He does not think of a jaguar's feelings when he fires his gun to kill it.
<u>Zaroff, on the other hand, hunts men. </u>He knows very well he is hunting rational beings like himself. But he does not care. He sees the men he hunts as inferior to him, just like Rainsford sees the animals as mere huntees. Yet, <u>Rainsford is incapable of condoning with Zaroff's behavior and perception. To Rainsford, what Zaroff does is pure muder.</u>
<u>This tension and the conflict this difference generates are what advances the plot. Both hunters have similar views, only one of them has taken it to the next level. Is only Zaroff wrong? Are both of them murderers? Is Rainsford a better men simply because he has a different sense of moral when it comes to other human beings, but no moral when it comes to animals? Thus, the moral stakes of the story make us wonder and question the characters.</u>
With all the technology we have today writing doesn't seem very necessary but there are gonna be times when we have to write.
Conjunctive adverbs, or simply transition adverbs
