C. A board of directors :)
Answer:
I'm sorry, but the way you worded this is impossible to understand. SO therefore, I cannot answer your question.
Explanation:
Answer:
Debit Accounts Receivable for $104,700; and Credit Sales Revenue for $104,700.
Debit Cash for $85,400; and Credit Accounts Receivable for $85,400.
Explanation:
The (summary) journal entries to record the items noted will look as follows:
<u>Particulars Debit ($) Credit ($) </u>
Accounts Receivable 104,700
Sales Revenue 104,700
<u><em>(To record net sales (all on account) for the year.) </em></u>
Cash 85,400
Accounts Receivable 85,400
<u>(Collections on accounts receivable during the year.) </u>
In this scenario, Blue Tech Inc.'s failure can be best attributed to <u>"Time compression diseconomies."</u>
We accept time compression diseconomies where the snappier a firm builds up the asset, the higher the improvement cost. We demonstrate that time compression diseconomies normally offer ascent to asset heterogeneity and henceforth upper hand in that one firm builds up the asset quicker than the other. We evaluate the supportability of the upper hand, determine conditions
under which the asset is "incomparable" and demonstrate that firm benefits are nonmonotonic in the degree of time compression diseconomies.
Answer:
a. a subsidy so that the firm can operate where marginal social benefit equals marginal social cost.
Explanation:
The private company is producing when the marginal revenue matches the marginal cost. The governemtn will want to decrease the cost (that's by subsidize the activity) to match the marginal revenue considering the positive externalities.
The government will do a pigouvian subsidy.
The government reasons to go for this is that the good or services provide positive externalities Which are enjoy by people who doens't purchase the good. Thus, this subsidy will increase the amount of ooutput thus, generating a better social benefit.
