Answer:
Check explanation
Explanation:
Complete the sentences with can/can't
A. He CAN make biscuits.
b. He CAN'T play the violin. He CAN play the guitar.
c. Mickey CAN make paintings.
d. Bob CAN cook delicious kangreburguers.
e. They CAN'T cook alone but they CAN cook with their mother.
f. Donald CAN drive a car.
g. They CAN swim.
h. He CAN'T sing. He has a terrible voice! .........
i. He CAN speak German.
Answer and Explanation:
<u>What functions as a subject is not really the relative clause, but the relative pronoun - "that".</u> Relative pronouns can act as subjects or objects in the clause they introduce. Let's compare:
1. I am the only person who saw Erica.
2. I am the only person who Erica saw and recognized.
Notice that in sentence 1, "who" is the subject of the clause "saw Erica". However, in sentence 2, "who" is the object. The subject of the verb "saw" now is "Erica".
<u>The same happens in the clause "that was hurt before". The relative pronoun "that" - which is substituting the noun "ankle" - is the subject of the clause "was hurt before". Therefore, we can say its noun function is the subject.</u>
He uses the word "careless"
Segsulizing women's clothing is not at all true statement as there is nothing related to men and women clothing with the segsulizing as clothing is not the factor of showing up.
<h3>What is meant by segsulizing women's clothing?</h3>
Segsulizing women's clothing is referred here about the women who use their reveling clothes to impress the men or women with their clothes.
The clothes of any person is not to impress anybody, but it is what a person feels comfortable in wears it. The clothes cannot be the factor to judge any person.
Thus, Segsulizing women's clothing is not at all true statement
For more details about segsulizing women's clothing, click here:
brainly.com/question/21092069
#SPJ1
