I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the distributive postulate. The expression 3x + 3 = 3(x + 1) is an example of a distributive postulate. It <span>says that multiplying a number by a group of numbers added together is the same as doing each multiplication separately. Hope this answers the question.</span>
2 because the difference in the equation must equal 0 so it must equal 6 so 6/3 is 2. Therefore the answer is 2
Answer: No. When 1 is substituted for the variable, the result is a false statement
Step-by-step explanation:
3x - 6(5x + 5) = 9x + 6
3x - 30x - 30 = 9x + 6
-27x -30 = 9x +6
-27x - 9x = 30 +6
-36x = 36
x = -1.
Substitute with x = -1 :
-3 - 6(-5 + 5) = -9 +6
-3 -30 + 30 = -3
-3 = -3
Therefore, the correct option is:
No. When 1 is substituted for the variable, the result is a false statement
APR is different than other compounding periods because you would need to find some equivelancy to compare things at.
