<span>Miranda v. Arizona.
The decision lead to the creation of what are commonly known as your "Miranda Rights", namely that before being questioned criminal suspects be advised of their rights to representation, and against self-incrimination.</span>
Answer:
a
Explanation:
because I have took the assiment
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This is pretty straightforward and can be understood by just common sense. Verbal instructions that instruct on what could be achieved by taking a particular step or movement or action can lead to better understanding and performance because an individual sees what the aim and target of the movement is and what goal is required to be achieved. In this way he is able to see clearly why he is actually making a move and not just making a move for the sake of it. It builds motivation and aids learning more effectively
Answer:
Explanation:It is not unusual for near-death experiencers returning from clinical death to report having received information concerning their pre-existence before they were conceived in the world. Some experiencers report of learning how they chose various aspects of their lives to be predestined before they were born. Some of the choices people have reported having chosen before birth include the selection of their birth parents, choosing their mission in life, and even choosing how they will die. This knowledge received by near-death experiencers of the past and future shows how some things in life are predestined while other things are not. It shows how free will and predestination both exist and work hand in hand. It means we choose our destiny in life before our birth into the world to live it. Because reincarnation is a concept found in many cultures and religions, the metaphor of life as a river which we chose before we were our birth, shows up in many of these cultures and religions. There are many aspects to a river which make it an excellent analogy to help us understand where we came from, where we're going, who we are, why we're here, and what life is all about. The following discussion will attempt to do just that.
Answer: the employee should do all of the above EXCEPT tolerate it if the harasser is a manager.
Explanation: sexual harrassment is a type of harassment behaviour characterized by the making of unwelcome and/or inappropriate remarks or physical advances in a workplace with implicit or explicit sexual overtones. This is a form of illegal employment discrimination.
Title VII is a federal law which prohibits any form of discrimination in the workplace and while this is the basis of all sexual harrassment claims, many states have sexual harrassment laws which are even stricter. The employer or manager has to take seriously all claims of sexual harrassment and are not exempt if the complaints are against them.
As well as all options except the first, the claimant should document as much as possible all things pertaining to the harassment such as where, when and how.
