Answer:
................
Explanation:
The Land Ordinance of 1785 was adopted by the United States Congress of the Confederation on May 20, 1785. It set up a standardized system whereby settlers could purchase title to farmland in the undeveloped west. Congress at the time did not have the power to raise revenue by direct taxation, so land sales provided an important revenue stream. The Ordinance set up a survey system that eventually covered over 3/4 of the area of the continental United States.
The earlier Ordinance of 1784 was a resolution written by Thomas Jefferson calling for Congress to take action. The land west of the Appalachian Mountains, north of the Ohio River, and east of the Mississippi River was to be divided into ten separate states. However, the 1784 resolution did not define the mechanism by which the land would become states, or how the territories would be governed or settled before they became states. The Ordinance of 1785 put the 1784 resolution in operation by providing a mechanism for selling and settling the land, while the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 addressed political needs.
Answer:
An Ethical Dilemma Problem
Throughout history it has been the practice in many countries to use convicts in scientific experiments or studies. One research group has developed a chemical that preliminary tests indicate that it will cure a fatal disease that affects many people. This group wants to seek volunteers from the prison population to advance their study. They would administer the chemical to consenting prisoners and monitor its effects on the human body.
No study of this type is ever risk free, but the researchers have designed a protocol that they believe minimizes it for the prisoners. Because there can always be unexpected consequences, including illness or death, participants are offered special privileges during the testing period and possible reduction in their sentences after the conclusion of the study. Since, some of the prisoners consenting to be treated for a long period of time with higher doses of the chemical than the other participants, this group is offered full pardons at the conclusion of the study as an inducement to consent. The research group has proposed its study to those in charge of the prison and these administrators must decide whether to allow the study. If John Stuart Mill was presented with this study proposal what would he determine? That is, from his Utilitarian perspective, would Mill claim this program is moral? Use his ideas and evaluate this program from his perspective and note how he would advise the administrators.
Explanation:
Answer:
adapting to her audience
Explanation:
In her speech, Kailyn was adapting to her audience.
By saying that an interesting thing or a fact, many orators captures the audiences interests. It is art in public speaking. By doing this the speaker tries to take advantage of the listeners and make their point valid and support their point. It also means to adapt to the environment in which you give the speech.
Thus Kailyn by such clever remarks and quoting tries to capture the attention of her listeners.
Hence the answer is "adapting to her audience".
The Himalayas were harsh, and hard to pass through. The climates were cruel and cold. Although, Hindu Kush was easier to pass through and typically had fair climate.
