1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexdok [17]
3 years ago
10

True or false:The Mexican Army was led by Santa Anna.

History
2 answers:
alukav5142 [94]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

True

I hope this helps!

igor_vitrenko [27]3 years ago
4 0
Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna was a Mexican politician and general. He was also the president of Mexico. In 1863 Santa Anna took command over the Mexican army and he and his forces successfully defeated the Texas rebels at the Alamo. This was known as the Battle of Goliad. So long story short, yes; the Mexican Army was led by Santa Anna. I sure hope this helps! :)
You might be interested in
What is a difference between the president’s formal and informal powers?
Nastasia [14]
Formal powers are changed over time, while informal powers cannot be changed. Formal powers are created in the executive branch. Informal powers are not. Formal powers are created by Congress, and informal powers aren’t .
5 0
2 years ago
What problem did the United States and Russia still have to solve after the
aniked [119]
I think B preventing nuclear war
3 0
4 years ago
In two words or less, define and describe the Southern reaction to the Civil Rights act of 1964
seraphim [82]

Adjustment and Compliance

Explanation:

The response of the South to the civil rights act can be said to be of compliance. The leaders who were vocal opposers of discrimination subsided into acceptance of the law. The act reflected a period of adjustment from the South in response to the act.

Miniscule rioting and violence were observed and some businessmen and politicians could hold up the courage to display some sort of resistance. The ban called out in support of excluding blacks was greatest in the “rim states” which included parts of modern-day Virginia, Texas, North Carolina and Florida.  

3 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between secession and nullification?
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

Nullification is when a state leaves the nation and secession is when a state refuses to comply with federal law.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement about the lifestyles of nobles is false?
jek_recluse [69]
They handled some of the manual labor on their fiefs.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What happen during the Dreyfus affair
    5·1 answer
  • According Locke why would falsely people believe they do not have the right to use force ?
    7·1 answer
  • State responses similar to those discussed in the source are an example of what historical development of the 19th and 20th
    7·1 answer
  • In the 1880s and 1890s, how did u.s. planters gain power in hawaii?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the settlers choose the location where they built jamestowne?​
    13·1 answer
  • Why didn’t the japanese surrender?
    5·1 answer
  • How do you think the Harlem Renaissance would affect American
    11·1 answer
  • Why has Andrew Jackson been called "the first modern president"?
    15·1 answer
  • To what parts of the world did Islam spread between the 7th and 17th centuries
    6·1 answer
  • While in exile how djd jews maintain there identitity
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!