I’d have to say C or D but I’d mainly go for C cause it’s pretty logical
Answer: A. a disagreement between the states over representation in Congress.
The main disagreement was over whether representation would be the same for all states, or based on a state's population size. Then there was also a question, for basing representation on population size, about whether slaves counted in a state's population or not.
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise were worked out during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787 in order to resolve these issues.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. Initially, a unicameral (one-chamber) legislature was envisioned. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
Water is a polar molecule and also acts as a polar solvent. When a chemical species is said to be "polar," this means that the positive and negative electrical charges are unevenly distributed. The positive charge comes from the atomic nucleus, while the electrons supply the negative charge.
The differences between Henry Ford and Alfred Sloan are b. Sloan focused his production on styles and types of cars, while Ford focused on producing less expensive cars.
<h3>Who are Henry Ford and Alfred Sloan?</h3>
Henry Ford was an entrepreneur who championed and revolutionized factory production with his assembly-line methods.
On the other hand, Alfred Sloan was the CEO of General Motors and masterminded the rise of General Motors as a global producer of vehicles.
However, Sloan went for expensive and stylish vehicles, while Ford reduced costs, making cars more affordable.
Thus, the differences between Henry Ford and Alfred Sloan are expressed by <u>Option B</u>.
Learn more about Henry Ford and Alfred Sloan at brainly.com/question/14167825
#SPJ1
George Kennan introduced the idea of containing communism
