According to the book, classical conditioning is a sort of learning in which a person learns to link two or more inputs and predict occurrences. To teach a youngster not to run into the street, it must be exposed to stimuli that are associated with not doing so.
Classical conditioning is a behavioral process in which biologically potent stimuli are paired with previously neutral stimuli. It also refers to the learning process resulting from this pairing, in which neutral stimuli usually elicit responses similar to those elicited by strong stimuli.
Classical conditioning differs from operant conditioning. In operant conditioning, the strength of voluntary behavior is modified through reinforcement or punishment. However, classical conditioning can influence operant conditioning in different ways. In particular, classically conditioned stimuli help reinforce operant responses.
Classical conditioning was first studied in detail by Ivan Pavlov. Pavlov conducted experiments on dogs and published the results in 1897. During a gastrointestinal study of Russian physiologists, Pavlov observed that the dogs he used as test subjects drooled when offered meat.
Learn more about Classical Conditioning here : brainly.com/question/7170975
#SPJ4
While the constitution is the law of the land it still lacked some things. The founding fathers knew that future government may take advantage of it, so they added the bill of rights and allowed for more amendments. The bill of rights which are the first ten amendments state that people have a freedom of speech and religion, the right to bare arms,the right to a fair trial ect. Other amendments provide for things like women suffrage.
Well, the census is to find the population, so it does by giving seats in the House.
Answer:
Lighting significantly affects performance
Explanation:
In this study, Ellen took two groups and applied the same IQ test to both of them. The only variable that changed between the groups was the level of lighting in the room. The first group was placed in a room with very bright lights and the second group was placed in a room with more normal lighting.
Individuals in the first group did better in the IQ test and she found that the difference between the two scores was statistically significant.
We say that a result is <u>"statistically significant" when it is not likely to occur randomly but rather is likely to be attributable to a specific cause.</u>
<u />
So we can say that <u>the better performance in the first group tests were not likely to occur randomly but it can be attributable to a specific cause. </u>
<u></u>
<u>Since the only variable that was different between the groups was the lightning, we can conclude that lighting significantly affects performance. </u>
