Drawing this square and then drawing in the four radii from the center of the cirble to each of the vertices of the square results in the construction of four triangular areas whose hypotenuse is 3 sqrt(2). Draw this to verify this statement. Note that the height of each such triangular area is (3 sqrt(2))/2.
So now we have the base and height of one of the triangular sections.
The area of a triangle is A = (1/2) (base) (height). Subst. the values discussed above, A = (1/2) (3 sqrt(2) ) (3/2) sqrt(2). Show that this boils down to A = 9/2.
You could also use the fact that the area of a square is (length of one side)^2, and then take (1/4) of this area to obtain the area of ONE triangular section. Doing the problem this way, we get (1/4) (3 sqrt(2) )^2. Thus,
A = (1/4) (9 * 2) = (9/2). Same answer as before.
Answer:
Question 1: 11%
Question 2: 89%
Question 3: 43%
Question 4: 11%
Step-by-step explanation:
Looking at picture 1, we need to find the crossing point between -1.2 and 0.05. That has 0.1056, which is the same as 10.56%. 10.56% rounds to 11%, so C is our answer.
Picture 2 has the same chart, but we just need to find the inverse, since the inequality sign is flipped. 100 - 10.56 is 89.44%, which rounds to 89%, so D is the answer for Picture 2.
Picture 3 has two tables. 0.73 has 76.73% and -0.41 has 34.09%. Subtract 34.09% from 76.73% to get 42.64% That rounds to 43%, so A is the answer.
Picture 4 essentially has the same expression as Picture 2 (only the sign has switched): P(z ≥ 1.25). The meeting point is 89.44%. Now, subtract that from 100 to get 10.56%, which rounds to 11%. C is our answer for Picture 4.
I hope this helps you! ^w^
If the numbers after the decimal terminate, yes, it's rational.
9.521521521 = 9,521,521,521 / 1,000,000,000
If they don't terminate, but the pattern continues (which I suspect is the case here), yes, it's still rational.
If <em>x</em> = 9.521521521…, then
1000<em>x</em> = 9521.521521521…
Subtract <em>x</em> from this to eliminate the fractional part:
1000<em>x</em> - <em>x</em> = 9521.521521521… - 9.521521521…
999<em>x</em> = 9512
<em>x</em> = 9512/999
If they don't terminate, but the pattern does <em>not</em> continue, meaning the next few digits could be something random like
9.521521521<u>19484929271283583457</u>…
then the number would be irrational.
Answer:
x=37/20
Step-by-step explanation:
4(2x-7)+3(3x-1)=3(2-x)
8x-28+9x-3=6-3x
17x+3x=6+31
20x=37
Answer:
no it does not have an inverse. because the determinate is 0 and you can't find the inverse of 0
