Answer:
I don't really think this is a question... (more a statement) so I'm not entirely sure how to answer you other than a simple "Okay. That's an interesting and true statement." Sorry I couldn't help. Please clarify what the question was. Was it a true of false question? Is the question not complete? Again, sorry, but I can't help you here.
The Line of Demarcation between Portugal and Spain was very unfair because Portugal got less land.
<h3>What was the line of demarcation?</h3>
This was an agreement that was signed between Spain and Portugal in order to forestall any conflict arising from either of them fighting for land in the New World.
The Line of Demarcation gave Portugal all the land to the East and gave Spain the land to the West. This was unfair to the Portuguese who ended up getting only Brazil while the Spanish got most of South America and the gold and wealth that came with it.
Find out more on the Line of Demarcation at brainly.com/question/699507
#SPJ1
How The Spanish Armada Failed To Conquer Against The English.
The defeat of a Spanish invasion force in 1588 was a moment of great patriotic pride for Elizabethan England. The nation's sailors had driven off the vast menace of their Catholic enemy.
<u>Answer:</u>
E. The court can hear only cases that have worked their way up from local courts.
This statement about the Supreme Court is true.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Clients or entities who are not happy with the jurisdiction and result of the lower courts can apply the request or petition at the U.S Supreme Court to hear their case. One can ask for the review of the case by asking it to grant a "writ of certiorari".
This means the lower court where the case was initially filed has to send a copy to the Supreme court for review. It generally never hears cases as such until the case is of national significance or the result of a case might harmonize a conflicting decision to settle or when it might have precedential value.
