Answer:
The Ferguson Unrest (sometimes called the Ferguson Uprising, Ferguson Protests, or Ferguson Riots) in Ferguson, Missouri involved protests and riots beginning on August 10, 2014, the day after the fatal shooting of Michael Brown by police officer Darren Wilson. The unrest sparked a vigorous debate in the United States about the relationship between law enforcement officers and African Americans, the militarization of police, and the use-of-force law in Missouri and nationwide.
Explanation:
Answer:a. reasoning from principle
Explanation:Catherine is drawing her reasoning from a principle which legally guides the sale of tobbaco to minors , so she moves from this general principle into making specific conclusion. She pays attention to this general principle and make statements to support that how reasoning from principle works .
Answer:
It was called the War of Independence
Answer:
Nepal has had a monarchy for most of its history. Nearly 16,000 people were killed in Nepal's civil war against the monarchy from 1996 to 2006. The Maoists ended ten years of civil war in 2006 and joined the peace process in Nepal. In 2008, the monarchy was overthrown by the Nepal Constituent Assembly and a federal multi-party democratic republic was established.
<em>hope that help you</em>
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Although the leaders of two enemy nations admit to a buildup of their own military forces, each sees the other country's actions as unreasonable and motivated by evil intentions. This situation best illustrates:
the mere exposure effect.
the just-world phenomenon.
mirror-image perceptions.
deindividuation.
social facilitation.
None of the listed answers are correct
Answer:
This situation best illustrates mirror-image perceptions.
Explanation:
The term mirror-image perception refers to the human tendency of viewing others as the enemy, as evil, especially in a situation of conflict. It is called mirror-image because both people or sides involved in the conflict see themselves as good, and the other as the villain. That is precisely the case described in the passage. Both leaders do not see a problem concerning their own buildup of their military forces - they "know" they are doing it for good reasons. But both of them also think that the other leader doing it is a sign of evil intentions on his part.
