The king’s actions that prompted nobles to force the king to sign the Magna Carta was his demand of heavy taxes to fund his unsuccessful wars in France.
This action forced the barons to rebel against the king and the Magna carter was signed in order to limit the king's power.
<h3>What Was the Magna Carter?</h3>
Magna Carta Libertatum, which is shortened as the Magna Carta, is a royal charter of rights agreed to by King John of England at Runnymede, near Windsor, on 15 June 1215. This Charter of rights is referred to as the first known documentation of Human Rights.
Prior to the signing of this charter, the king was viewed as the absolute power and could do as he willed.
Some of his actions were detrimental to the Nobles and in order to preserve his throne from imminent take over, his subjects forced him to sign the Magna Carta.
Learn more about the Magna Carter at brainly.com/question/25378155
#SPJ1
They argue the first event toward democratization is the threat of revolution, then creation of civil society organizations, and lastly an active middle class to provide moderation.
When the citizens demand or threaten revolution, the elites must give up some power to maintain overall power. This is step one and is then up to the creation of organizations to enforce the elites come through with their promises. The middle class aids in providing education but also a vehicle for change. They are more moderate and will not allow the system to go to the extremes of the ordinary citizens or working classes.
An alliance is someone or group you team up with.
Strict scrutiny, moderate scrutiny, and logical basis scrutiny are three tests.
To evaluate the legitimacy of differential treatment based on a suspicious classification, a Strict scrutiny test is applied (race, ethnic origin, religion).
In free exercise clause cases, the court previously applied strict scrutiny more frequently, as in Sherbert v. Verner (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), but the Employment Division v. Smith decision altered the approach (1990).
When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. The law must have been carefully crafted to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest" and have been passed by the legislature in order to pass rigorous scrutiny.
A law impacting a fundamental right must have a compelling state purpose in order to pass under the Strict Scrutiny criterion. In order to accomplish the goal or interest of the government, the law must also be carefully crafted.
To know more about Strict Scrutiny refer to: brainly.com/question/11550284
#SPJ1
An amendment is a written change to the constitution
