<span>Which of these tools can be used by archeologists to find fossils?
</span><span>An aerial photograph
</span><span>Which of the following describes a function of a satellite?
</span><span>Helps scientists track weather
</span><span>Which of these can vary in length of time?
Era
</span><span>The following examples are primary sources except
</span><span>an encyclopedia that provides factual details about the finding of Lucy
</span><span>A historian wonders why an ancient civilization disappeared. He suggests that a natural disaster might have destroyed it thousands of years ago. What step should the historian take next?
</span><span>Test the hypothesis
</span>
Answer:
Europeans generally used a one-crop economy in their colonies, for they are trying to generate wealth, instead of looking after the economies of the colonies. Most of the time, the crop is a "cash crop" or a crop that is worth a lot when needed, but usually cannot be eaten or used as food. They can include Tobacco, Cotton, etc.
However, the usage of only producing one product would lead to a large dependancy on it, and the economy of the certain country would depend on the demand as well as the price of the product. The higher the demand, the better the price, which leads to a better GDP. Of course, this may change on the whim, which makes an extremely unstable economy.
In today's world, only one one-resource economy works, and that is oil. Oil is used for a lot of things, including creating gasoline, diesel, etc, and is used in many modern appliances. However, with the world soon seeing the disastrous affects of the usage of fossil fuels, they are slowly transitioning to renewable resources, which may soon put the "oil kings" out of business, and propelling them back into a third-world status.
In the end, the Europeans used one crop economies in their colonies to generate quick cash, and to keep the economies of the colonies small, which may lead to them having trouble with uprisings.
~
Cause is what happens and effect is the result of that action
<span>William Jefferson Blythe III</span>
I would call this the 'Red Scare' as a phobia against communism or radical politics after WWI probably because the Soviet Union came out of WWI but on the contrary there were a lot of sympathizers to the cause of the Soviet Union and interest in their new experiment of actually trying to implement socialism at least among the Canadian and American working classes and many union members.