1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kari74 [83]
3 years ago
15

Graduated licensing is designed to introduce beginning drivers to driving. True or False

Social Studies
1 answer:
sertanlavr [38]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The above statement is True.

Explanation:

The above statement is True.

A graduated licensing system is an approach that enforces some restrictions to the newcomer driver or the one who has just passed their driving test. Through this approach, the system wants the new driver to build their skills of driving to the next level so that they commit less road crime in the future.

You might be interested in
The accessibility of an attitude refers to how easily an attitude comes to mind. Please select the best answer from the choices
____ [38]

Answer: true

Explanation: In general, highly accessible attitudes tend to be stronger. Attitude ambivalence: Ambivalence of an attitude refers to the ratio of positive and negative evaluations that make up that attitude.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast the views of Hamilton as opposed to Jefferson and Madison. Discuss your own views of how the Constitution s
netineya [11]

I had intended to post Part II of the WWI question last night, but got caught up doing movie reviews on Life of Ando.  So to slake your ravenous historical thirst in the meantime, here is my assignment from my history class this past week.  If you’re really into American history and how the politics of the early Republic shook out, Jefferson vs. Hamilton is a great study.  It’s also a little, I guess comforting, to know that as bad as we think today’s politicians are,  politics was always a very dirty game.  Like Bismarck said, “Laws are like sausages.  Better to not see them being made.”  And as Ecclesiastes says, “There’s nothing new under the sun.”

1) How did the political philosophies of these men differ?

Most clear thinking Americans could probably tell you at least the rudimentary facts of who Thomas Jefferson was. Far fewer would likely have a definite idea of who Alexander Hamilton was and what his contributions as a Founding Father were. Yet his conception of an American government was just as important as that of Jefferson. Both founders foresaw the new nation as a great future power, and both had very different maps of how to get it there.

Jefferson believed the nation’s strength lay in its agricultural roots. He favored an agrarian nation with most powers reserved for the states. He was very opposed to a strong central authority and believed that the people were the final authority in government. Jefferson also encouraged active support for the French Revolution

Hamilton favored a strong central authority. He believed a strong government was necessary to provide order so that business and industry could grow. He envisioned America becoming an industrial power. To this end he sought to establish a national bank and fund the national debt in order to establish firm base for national credit. Hamilton believed that the government should be run by those who were educated and wealthy rather than by “the mob.” He opposed involvement in the French Revolution and worried Jeffersonians by appearing, and maybe even being, too cozy with Britain.

<span>2) How was the conflict between Jefferson and Hamilton a significant factor in the emergence of political parties?
</span>
The Jefferson/Hamilton conflict helped give rise to political parties by polarizing factions on opposite political sides. Those who backed Jefferson’s Democratic-Republicans supported states rights, a strict reading of the Constitution, and support for the French Revolution. Those who back Hamilton’s Federalists preferred a much stronger central government, an “elastic” reading of the Constitution, and a hands-off approach to the French Revolution.

3) Which view do you think was best for the US – Hamilton’s or Jefferson’s – and why? [This part should be several paragraphs long]

I don’t know if either view could be considered better or worse for America. Forced to choose, I would probably lean toward Hamiltonian ideas, but I believe both served a vital and necessary role in forming the government. Hamilton was a visionary and saw the potential of a great industrial power. His support of a strong central authority was a key reason the young nation was able to sustain itself in the early days, especially in such crises like Shayes Rebellion. One reason he may have felt as strongly as he did was his service in the Revolutionary War. Being one of Washington’s staff, he experienced first hand the difficulty the Continental army had with an ineffectual congress to keep it fed and supplied. The weak congress was not able to raise funds to pay for supplies because it had no real power.

For all his vision and innovation, Hamilton’s ambition may have carried him too far if left unchecked. The federal government may have become too powerful and curbed the rights of citizens, which in fact did happen to a degree during the Adams administration. Jefferson and his policies provided an important counter balance to Hamilton. Jefferson’s support of states’ rights and agriculture helped to offset the influence of the Hamilton-supporting merchants and manufacturers. However, without Hamilton’s counter-balance Jefferson’s policies may have left the government weak and ineffectual to deal with major crises both at home and abroad.

Each viewpoint needed the other to create a government that would be strong enough to protect itself and it’s people from internal and external strife, but not so strong that it would infringe on the rights of the people as enumerated in the Bill of Rights and in the Revolutionary spirit. These issues, of course, weren’t resolved or ceased to be relevant after Hamilton and Jefferson left the scene. These are still very much the issues we deal with even now, over 200 years later. As much as we might dislike, or even hate, the position of the “other” party, without some balance both sides would undoubtedly abuse their power…more than they already do.

5 0
3 years ago
why our world would be a better place if people were more educated about Equality, Diversity,and Inclusion things and practiced
wel
The world would be a better place if people were more educated about equality and diversity because both genders male and female would know their rights ,treat them respectfully,and not take advantage of the rights and out use them when it comes equality and the both genders would not judge each other.As well as to diversity the world would be an better place because all race and ethnic backgrounds it would less racism and people would work together with the different backgrounds despite their gender,ethnicity,race,and sexual orientation.
4 0
3 years ago
What is one example of a traditional economy? a barter system that does not rely on money or other currencya restricted system t
GREYUIT [131]
A) a barter system that does not rely on money or other currency.
7 0
3 years ago
A school administrator is interested in knowing the percentage of girls in school who are involved in sports this year. Which ty
ziro4ka [17]

The correct answer is Descriptive

Descriptive research is one of the classifications of scientific research, in which its objective is to describe the characteristics of a population, a phenomenon or experience for the study carried out.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • If warmly supportive parents are especially likely to have children with high self-esteem, this would most clearly indicate that
    8·2 answers
  • Who was John sequin? Please help me
    10·2 answers
  • The British commonwealth allowed many countries to maintain local control, but aligned with them
    12·1 answer
  • When no weapons of mass destruction were found following the U.S. invasion of Iraq, some Americans revised their memories of the
    10·1 answer
  • How was the Justinian Code a valuable accomplishment of the
    9·1 answer
  • How long can you stay in japan without citizenship?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following reflects a difference between debate on the House and Senate floors? A. Debate in the senate has very few
    9·2 answers
  • Explain the benefits of a compound interest in an investment
    10·2 answers
  • 3. A relationship in which two different organisms live in close association with
    9·2 answers
  • A client who presents for an eye examination is diagnosed as having a visual acuity of 20/40. the client asks the nurse what the
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!