Answer:
The answers are given below.
1.There are many limits on free speech= Weak.
2. The use of solar energy can affect foreign policy by decrease oil imports= Strong and unique
3.Too much dependency on technology is bad for people= weak
4.The federal government should spend at least 15 percent of its budget on developing renewable energy sources= Strong and unique.
Explanation: The sentences provided on the passage are divided into strong and weak category for thesis statement.
The sentence 1 and 3 are seemed as weak. Because these statement are very common as a statement. So it doesn't make any unique statement for the thesis. Moreover, these statements doesn't have any accurate information and logic which can make a biased view on the thesis. They are relative views which depend on the side effect.
On the other hand the sentence 2 and 4 is strong and more unique. These sentences are based on obvious issues which have accurate facts and information. As a result it is easy for the writer to present the topic strongly. Moreover these statements are about solar energy issue and renewable energy issue which unique to explain. Because now these issues are the trending matter in the world.
they are assigned to one of the grain teams, working under a man named Slim.
yw :)))
The unstated assumption here is that anyone who thinks that using these embryos is unjust because they believe the embryo is already a baby, does not care about the lives currently being affected by these diseases that need cures. There is also an unstated assumption that embryos are not alive and therefore what happens to this “ball of cells” does not really matter. There is an assumption that these embryos are a key factor in finding treatment for these diseases.
The statement is for harvesting embryos by assuming that the reader agrees with the fact that embryos are not alive and that they are not human beings yet. Having to appeal to a reader is an important part in writing and this particular paragraph would probably not appeal so much to mothers. Some might argue that these harsh unstated assumptions about the audience of this passage would affect the overall opinion and reactions to it.
