Answer:
The correct answer is "A probate court case on a will of a deceased person"
Explanation:
The Constitution of the United States of America has put forward the judicial powers of the federal courts under Article 3. These powers are conferred upon the Supreme Court and other courts who's status is lower than that of the Supreme Court and were created by the Congress.
Section 2 of this article details a broad scope of the powers these courts posses. It maintains that the power extends to all cases in which the US is a party, cases that cover ambassadors and public officials, cases that involve two states, cases that involve citizens of different states. and cases between states and foreign states or entities.
In light of the above mentioned powers, all of the options in the question except the one concerning the probate court case fall under the ambit of federal courts. Federal courts do no have the power to probate wills. These cases are left to the state courts
The choices are:
A. Alaskan
B. Chinese
C. Native American
D. Indian
Answer:
The answer is letter A, Alaskan.
Explanation:
Food staple <u>refers to the food that is commonly eaten as a routine in an area. </u>This constitutes a large portion of a person's diet, thus it becomes a significant food. For example, most people from the Philippines eat rice. Thus, it makes "rice" as a staple food in the country.
When it comes to the Alaskan ethnic group, fish is most likely considered to be a staple in the diet. This is related to their abundant number of coastlines in the country. T<u>his is the reason why their fishing industry is very sustainable in the area</u>. They have an abundant supply of seafood, such as fish.
<u>So, this means that fish is mostly likely to be the food that is included in their diet.</u>
Answer:
c. Legalism.
Explanation:
One [philosophy in Chinese society that believes in the forced attempts to change people to act properly through the use of restrictive regulations is known as legalism. This philosophy believes in the need for the people to be confined with some rules so as to benefit the society. It puts the need for order as superior above any other human concerns.
Improvement of the human situation with the help of examples or education or even moral values is useless for the legalists who believe in the need for a strong government and the implication of strict laws and regulations.
I believe the answer is: <span>Groupthink
</span><span>Groupthink refers to a situation where members of a social group decided to confrom into a certain idea in order to feel accepted by the group even though they may have differing opinion.
This form of dysfunctional group often created if a group do not give a chance for individuals with opposing value/point of view as a part of the members.</span>
