I have never read a story called "The Long Journey Through the Wilderness" but I am an avid Bible reader and I study it throughly. The Biblical answer to your question is D. Hope this helps and if you have any other Bible questions, feel free to ask me! :)
Answer: C) It is a dependent clause.
Explanation: an independent clause is a sentence that has complete meaning on its own (it has at least a subject, a verb and all the necessary complements), a dependent clause is the contrary, is a phrase that, in order to make sense, it needs to be with an independent clause. The given excerpt is a clear example of a dependent clause, because as we can see, it doesn't have complete sense, we can tell that it is missing something.
<span>
I feel that the Antony speech maybe would've been more moving.
<span>First off, the murder of Caesar was a traumatizing one (they stabbed
him like twenty seven times or somthing). I would've been on the conspirators sides
if they haven't done it so brutally. IT seemed as if though they did it
out of their own pleasure. Who stabs someone <em>twenty seven </em>times? </span>
Brutus's speech discusses how he loved Caesar (even though he stabbed
him, again, twenty seven times) and how he did it for the good of Rome.
With an ambitious ruler like Caesar, Rome would've become slaves to
him. However, Antony's speech says how he loved Caesar like all of Rome
and how he had helped all of them and how Brutus was a "honorable man"
(sarcasm ). I wouldn't have been moved by Brutus's speech because i had
KNOWN what had happened during the murder. I witnessed it. And how
different it was from out of love for Rome. It seemed more like out of
hatred for Caesar. </span>
