Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is C
B or (0,-2) is the answer i would go with
Answer:
D. ∆XVW ≅ ∆XBC
Step-by-step explanation:
Angle X = Angle X (vertical angles are congruent)
Angle V = angle B (corresponding angles are congruent)
Angle W = angle C (corresponding angles are congruent)
The three angels in ∆XVW are congruent to the three corresponding angles in ∆XBC.
Therefore, the statement that indicates both triangles are congruent is:
∆XVW ≅ ∆XBC
<h3>
Answer: Comelia is correct</h3>
====================================================
Explanation:
We're told that "Christopher says that all Rational (Q) numbers are Whole (W)", which makes Christopher not correct. Some rational numbers are whole numbers. For instance, the number 7 = 7/1 is rational and it's a whole number as well.
However something like 1/2 is rational, but it's not a whole number. A whole number doesn't have any fractional or decimal part to it. It can be thought of the number of something.
Comelia is correct because all whole numbers are rational. If x is some whole number, then x = x/1 is rational as well. Replace x with any whole number you want. Her statement does not work in reverse as shown above.
When drawing a Venn diagram, the circle for "whole numbers" will be entirely inside the circle for "rational numbers", and not the other way around.
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
Because if line segment BD bisects angle B then angles CBD and ABD can be proved congruent by SAS
