Answer:
It can be inferred that Allen believes the case of flag-burning can be handled just like any other case and all the opinions on the topic are all welcome.
The text evidence is "not treating the flag-burning case like the simple case it is".
Explanation:
Based on the given lines, it can be inferred that Allen shared his opinion and he believes that the specific case could be analyzed in a manner that is similar to those used for other similar cases. This is based on the line in the text as quoted above. The suggestions from everyone on the specific issue can be tabled and considered.
That which an argumentative text contains that an informative text does not contain is: Opinions.
An argumentative text is a text that is aimed at convincing the audience to take the author's side of an argument. An argumentative text contains the personal opinions of the author and facts that are backed by evidence.
This is not the case with informative texts. Informative texts are mostly unbiased and simply provide the facts that occurred in the past.
So, informative texts do not contain opinions.
Learn more about informative texts here:
brainly.com/question/10022815
The age to drive should not be raised to 21. Sixteen year olds are perfectly capable of driving. They are also in high school and soon to be in college. They should be able to leave and get food as well as drive to practice if they wish to peruse sports. If you are legally mature at the age of 18. Then you should be able to drive since way before the age of 21 at least.
The meaning of cryptic in this sentence is - mysterious
