The right answer that will fill in the blank is the first option which is the managing for a competitive advantage and diversity. It is one of the challenges that the managers faces today because a lot of things arises now a days, especially new technologies and advances that could rise competition. It is where this challenge occurs and opens as a challenge for managers and also the diversity for now a days, a lot of things could be set as a factor in competition.
Answer:
Clinton and Trump on fiscal policy In the 2016 Presidential election campaign
The policy that will change aggregate demand (AD) the most is a cut in taxes.
Explanation:
Aggregate demand is fueled mostly by household consumption. A cut in taxes increases the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) and reduces the marginal propensity to save (MPS), but at the same time fuels the marginal propensity to invest by firms trying to meet the new aggregate demand, thereby increasing the aggregate supply (AS) which is the real GDP output.
Answer:
36.26%
Explanation:
Simple rate of return:
return/investment
<u>return:</u>
In this case, it will be the cost saving for the new machine: 161,000
<u>investment</u>
We will decrease the investment by the recovery from the old machine.
468,000 new machine - 24,000 salvage value of new = 444,000
<u>Then, proceed to calculate:</u>
161,000/444,000 = 0.3612 = 36.26%
Consideration:
Is important to state that this rate, do not consider the time value of money, neither the cash flow of the project.
Answer:
D. Moving averages
Explanation:
Moving averages is a method of forecasting which is adopted to receive an overall idea of the trends for a given data
Moving averages is an average of any subset of numbers.
This method is very useful when the long-term trends are to be forecast or when the number of data sets are large in numbers.
<span>Technically, Kyle lied to Patrick about the time at which he would punch him. However, there is no contract to prove that this was what was said on the phone (heresay). Additionally, it does not mention that there was any sort of agreement or consideration made between the two of them regarding this. And even if there was, there might be a legality issue due to the fact that punching is both assault and battery when committed on a person, so the contract may not even be enforceable.
In terms of civil torts, Kyle didn't really commit anything that is pursuable in court, but did commit battery and assault. If Patrick fell or hit his head further and was injured/killed, he would be liable for an involuntary action, of which would be manslaughter if Patrick died. He would also be able to be sued for wrongful death by Patrick's family.</span>