Hello it's me,
I've thought about us for a long, long time,
Maybe I think too much but something's wrong,
There's something here that doesn't last too long,
Maybe I shouldn't think of you as mine.
Your answers would be All for our country and Battle born. Hope this helps!
Answer:
see below *ALSO SPELL CHECK PLEASE GRAMMERLY ISNT WORKING FOR SOME REASON*
Explanation:
In the persepctive of the German people, the post-war punishment that would be percieved as the "harshest" or "most upsetting" was most likely punishment 1,4 and 5, and the ones that were probably viewed as the "east harsh" or insignificant to the German people was punishment 8. The reason that I assume that the harshest, most significant, and most upsetting punishment(s) were 1,4, and 5 is because these are the punishments that effected the german people <em>directly. </em>The loss of land probably led to relocation and people losing homes, property, etc. The fact that Germany has to take the blame for the war led to racism and prosecution of the German people, many of which had nothing to do with the war and wanted it to end as much as everyone else. And, lastly, punishment 5 was one of the most upsetting because the debt that Germany went into (-33 billion dollars!) will no doubt have caused inflammation of prices, poverty, and lack of resources due to low government funding, which would have effected the people the most, especially those who depended on government help and were not doing well financially to begin with. The punishment that was probably the least significant to the German people was 8, "force all military leaders, including Kaiser Wilhelm II to face trials for war crimes". This is because the people did not have a direct relation with any of these leaders, so it does not concern them as much as punishments like 1,4 and 5 did.
Answer:
Explanation:
An attorney making an opening statement might typically include a brief version of the facts and the supporting evidence.
Rules of evidence consist of a series of court rules guaranteeing presentation of reliable evidence during trial.
3. Li and Anderson are opposing parties in a lawsuit. Li's attorney is questioning Anderson on the witness stand. Anderson says that a friend of Li's said Li was drunk at the time of the accident. Anderson's statement is admissible.False
<span>The purpose of SNCC during the early years of the Civil Rights era was that it coordinated students around the south in resisting segregation laws.</span>
