An explanation of how a value judgment would have no objective truth because there is a difference in opinion/perspective.
<h3>What is an Objective Truth?</h3>
This refers to the truth that is spoken without the <em>use of bias</em> that is accurate.
Hence, we can see that a value judgment is the assessment of a thing as being good or bad based on the standards and priority of a person.
A factual statement on the other hand is either true or false and would remain the same, irrespective of perspectives or opinions.
Read more about objective truths here:
brainly.com/question/17133736
#SPJ1
Answer: lacking strength
Explanation:
The highlighted word is ''frail''.
The definition of frail in relation to a human being is someone who is physically weak and fragile.
In this context therefore, it is logical to assume that the word means that the person being referred to (the mother) is lacking strength. This would make sense because the mother is getting old and people get weaker as they age.
- Tone when writing is the use of <u>specific words</u> that influence the readers and affects the theme of the message.
- Please note that your question is incomplete as you did not mention the NPR article and without this, it is impossible to give you the answer. Therefore, I would give you a general overview that should help you.
- There are two major types of tone which are negative and positive tone.
- Positive tone has to do with the words that are used by an author to show positivity or evoke good feelings. Negative tone on the other hand, is the opposite of positive tone which shows negative feelings.
- Some examples of words that evoke positive tone: Happy, Approving, Appreciative, Calm, etc. Some examples of words that evoke negative tone include: Angry, Fearful, Uncertain, etc.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/2962843
Answer: This passage from Chapter 31 is Scout's exercise in thinking about the world from Boo Radley's perspective.
The correct answers would be questions D " Did any of the Japanese or German students learn to speak Navajo" and E " What kind of code did the American Indians use during World War I". These are the questions that could help the reader understand the military leader's fear, since if the answers are yes they did learn to speak it, and a simple code, (respectively) then it would be perfectly sane to feel apprehension at using the same code again. Options A, B and C are not relevant because they do not contribute to the subject, for example, it doesn't matter how many people spoke Navajo before World War I, what is important is how many can learn it.
