1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
castortr0y [4]
3 years ago
15

On what were the boundaries of the African countries that gained their independence after World War II most often based?

History
1 answer:
sdas [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

On divisions forced under European imperialism

Explanation:

The boundaries of the African countries that gained their independence after World War II was based on imperialism. The rise of Imperialism brought the rush to invasion, colonization, and expansion in Africa. During those ages, many Europeans tried to explore central portions of the continent to get access to the natural resources and to extend their hold in Africa to make colonies. After World War II, many of the African countries gained independence from European imperialism.

You might be interested in
According to the report, most deaths during civil war are due to:
strojnjashka [21]
<span>Most deaths in the Civil War were due to diseases that had nothing to do with combat.
Hope this helps! Please let me know if I'm wrong. :)</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Did Marco polo had a physical features on his journey?
slega [8]
Yes he did I d k but I can not remember at all so look it up
5 0
3 years ago
What problems did Daniel Shays face as the<br> war ended?
den301095 [7]
The answer is when she was busy with the war ily
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is LEAST characteristic of the history of political parties in the United States during the twentieth cen
Ket [755]

Answer:

D. the loss of party patronage power.

Explanation:

hope this helps! ;)

6 0
3 years ago
How can governments both harm and help there people?
hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

Governments can be run and managed well or poorly based on leaders in charge- look at explanation

Explanation:

A government can usually dictate to some degree what people do. So if the government passes a law that bans a certain race or gender from doing a certain thing, whether it be applying for a job, or eating at a certain restaurant, then the government is limiting human rights. This, morally to us as a modern society as seen as a bad thing because it judges people based on things they cannot change, instead of things people can change like attitude or character. Now lets say a government decided to pass a law that provided healthcare or education for its people. This would be a good thing because people who become educated or maintain their health will most likely be beneficial to the society that they are a part of.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did ancient israelites believe connecting to god?
    11·1 answer
  • Who had rights during the Egyptian time? <br> a-slaves<br> b-scribes<br> c-women<br> d-citizens
    11·1 answer
  • Ancient Greece gave us new ideas in mathematics, philosophy, drama, literature, journalism, medicine, science, and every other e
    13·1 answer
  • How did the enlightenment influence the Declaration of Independence and bill of rights
    15·2 answers
  • Which industry was key to the early success of english colonists
    10·1 answer
  • When you study US history, you learn about the Founding Fathers of democracy in the United States. In this lesson, you read abou
    6·2 answers
  • What impact did the enlightenment have on the civil rights movement
    9·1 answer
  • Read the amendment to answer the question *
    6·1 answer
  • Can separate opportunities be equal opportunities
    10·2 answers
  • What was the song title written on the sheet Vivo and Gabi delivered to Marta?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!